Message from @Sentient23
Discord ID: 662477155199877132
Yes?
all statements are argument
s
@Clincoin he's just agreeing with me
What definition of argument are u operating under?
```im not shitposting im genuinely racist
``` Bruh
and arguments do in my book have to bear meaning or intent
What i said bears meaning and intent
not related to the question at hand
yes it is related to the question at hand since you sadi "depends on what culture"
oh wait
lmao
youre that guy who didnt ban the dude that posted gore on ur server
And that then banned me because i destroyed you with the argument from motion
lmao
nice stinking fish attack, evidence precedes claims
claims contain evidence...
it's also a red herring and an ad hominem. I do not take those as higher forms of communication. If you truly believe you "destroyed" someone i hope you used more valid arguments
Whats up with these r/iamverysmart lads who keep on misusing fallacies?
Fallacy Fallacy
i addressed your argument
and i never insulted you
Claiming a fallacy against someone does not make their argument invalid
It is an insult to claim i got destroyed with an argument from motion.
under what definition of insult are you operating
fairly certain that if your claim was true, that you have interacted with me before, then you also know what you experienced as potential thumbscrews. I keep insults under the definition of untrue claims about another, used intentionally to offend the target
Your non-evidence based claims are insulting to me
How do you know i used it to offend you?
Mind reading is disingenuous
If you claim that i didn't ban a person that posted gore in my server, simply say their name and i'll give you the ban list <a:shruganimated:421995622346784768>
Holy shit you fucking 2 mongols, start from a clean slate.
Now
he's cringe i remember i debated him before
I dont care
clean slate
It's not the first time he has done this, i want him to provide evidence or realize he needs to stop this
So @Maksim What definitions of capitalism and nationalism did you use for your question?
Are you kidding me? Why would you expect me to still cling on evidence from more than 5 months ago of you not banning a dude that posted a picture of dead germans in ww2 to claim superiority as an american over germany
Then drop it.
And how do you expect me to have evidence that you banned me because i destroyed you, why would i screenshot my argument with you prior to getting banned? When i got banned i couldn't have collected evidence since i was banned