Message from @Sentient23
Discord ID: 662478691531620355
Adhomining means insulting instead of addressing arguments
i addressed your argument
and i never insulted you
Claiming a fallacy against someone does not make their argument invalid
It is an insult to claim i got destroyed with an argument from motion.
under what definition of insult are you operating
fairly certain that if your claim was true, that you have interacted with me before, then you also know what you experienced as potential thumbscrews. I keep insults under the definition of untrue claims about another, used intentionally to offend the target
Your non-evidence based claims are insulting to me
How do you know i used it to offend you?
Mind reading is disingenuous
If you claim that i didn't ban a person that posted gore in my server, simply say their name and i'll give you the ban list <a:shruganimated:421995622346784768>
Holy shit you fucking 2 mongols, start from a clean slate.
Now
he's cringe i remember i debated him before
I dont care
clean slate
It's not the first time he has done this, i want him to provide evidence or realize he needs to stop this
So @Maksim What definitions of capitalism and nationalism did you use for your question?
Are you kidding me? Why would you expect me to still cling on evidence from more than 5 months ago of you not banning a dude that posted a picture of dead germans in ww2 to claim superiority as an american over germany
Then drop it.
And how do you expect me to have evidence that you banned me because i destroyed you, why would i screenshot my argument with you prior to getting banned? When i got banned i couldn't have collected evidence since i was banned
No
@Clincoin Capitalism being free-markets and consumerism.
Nationalism being the preservation and valuation of one's culture and moral code.
What type of free market, do you mean absolute free markets or with anti-monopoly action?
Also, what do you define as culture under nationalism? morals i get, but culture is very vague.
Either.
Culture is an irrational concept, one simply knows it can it usually cannot be quantified. One knows if he is in or out of it.
Why can't it be quantified
I just explained
well do it again
No
just ctrl-v
You can have free markets without allowing international markets to have influence in theory, so i'd say they can with workarounds definetely be compatible
But if you have free markets with outside influences then surely no
I'd figure either evaluated capitalism or mixed economics.
Classic Fascist
yes.
Well if markets influence culture, that which we cannot know what is, then we cannot discuss it
too little knowledge
Free Markets mean corporations will always attempt to make as much money as possible
Not necessarily, again, workarounds can exist
A free market can exist without the free exploitation of resources