Fallacy Fallacy

Adhomining means insulting instead of addressing arguments

i addressed your argument

and i never insulted you

Claiming a fallacy against someone does not make their argument invalid

It is an insult to claim i got destroyed with an argument from motion.

under what definition of insult are you operating

fairly certain that if your claim was true, that you have interacted with me before, then you also know what you experienced as potential thumbscrews. I keep insults under the definition of untrue claims about another, used intentionally to offend the target

Your non-evidence based claims are insulting to me

How do you know i used it to offend you?

Mind reading is disingenuous

If you claim that i didn't ban a person that posted gore in my server, simply say their name and i'll give you the ban list <a:shruganimated:421995622346784768>

Holy shit you fucking 2 mongols, start from a clean slate.

Now

he's cringe i remember i debated him before

I dont care

clean slate

It's not the first time he has done this, i want him to provide evidence or realize he needs to stop this

So @Maksim What definitions of capitalism and nationalism did you use for your question?

Are you kidding me? Why would you expect me to still cling on evidence from more than 5 months ago of you not banning a dude that posted a picture of dead germans in ww2 to claim superiority as an american over germany

Then drop it.

And how do you expect me to have evidence that you banned me because i destroyed you, why would i screenshot my argument with you prior to getting banned? When i got banned i couldn't have collected evidence since i was banned

No

@Clincoin Capitalism being free-markets and consumerism.

Nationalism being the preservation and valuation of one's culture and moral code.

What type of free market, do you mean absolute free markets or with anti-monopoly action?
Also, what do you define as culture under nationalism? morals i get, but culture is very vague.

Either.
Culture is an irrational concept, one simply knows it can it usually cannot be quantified. One knows if he is in or out of it.

Why can't it be quantified

I just explained

well do it again

No

just ctrl-v

You can have free markets without allowing international markets to have influence in theory, so i'd say they can with workarounds definetely be compatible

But if you have free markets with outside influences then surely no

I'd figure either evaluated capitalism or mixed economics.

Classic Fascist

yes.

@Clincoin It's not just international markets

Well if markets influence culture, that which we cannot know what is, then we cannot discuss it

too little knowledge

Free Markets mean corporations will always attempt to make as much money as possible

Not necessarily, again, workarounds can exist