Message from @Sentient23

Discord ID: 662476345283969056


2020-01-03 02:01:28 UTC  

@Clincoin Capitalism is incompatible with nationalism.

2020-01-03 02:02:02 UTC  

By what definitions?

2020-01-03 02:02:44 UTC  

@Clincoin capitalism is a threat to culture

2020-01-03 02:02:59 UTC  

Depends on what culture you speak of <a:shruganimated:421995622346784768>

2020-01-03 02:02:59 UTC  

Replaces trad buildings with concrete monstrosities

2020-01-03 02:03:03 UTC  

yes

2020-01-03 02:03:06 UTC  

F WORD black culture

2020-01-03 02:03:19 UTC  

It replaces all cultures with copy pasted mcculture

2020-01-03 02:03:26 UTC  

I thought no shitposting in <#587028275918929925> was a thing...

2020-01-03 02:03:33 UTC  

im not shitposting im genuinely racist

2020-01-03 02:03:36 UTC  

Arguments, not statements

2020-01-03 02:03:46 UTC  

arguments are statements

2020-01-03 02:03:56 UTC  

statements are not arguments

2020-01-03 02:04:00 UTC  

Yes?

2020-01-03 02:04:02 UTC  

all statements are argument

2020-01-03 02:04:03 UTC  

s

2020-01-03 02:04:10 UTC  

@Clincoin he's just agreeing with me

2020-01-03 02:04:15 UTC  

What definition of argument are u operating under?

2020-01-03 02:04:17 UTC  

```im not shitposting im genuinely racist
``` Bruh

2020-01-03 02:04:19 UTC  

and arguments do in my book have to bear meaning or intent

2020-01-03 02:04:28 UTC  

What i said bears meaning and intent

2020-01-03 02:04:42 UTC  

not related to the question at hand

2020-01-03 02:04:53 UTC  

yes it is related to the question at hand since you sadi "depends on what culture"

2020-01-03 02:05:14 UTC  

oh wait

2020-01-03 02:05:15 UTC  

lmao

2020-01-03 02:05:23 UTC  

youre that guy who didnt ban the dude that posted gore on ur server

2020-01-03 02:05:36 UTC  

And that then banned me because i destroyed you with the argument from motion

2020-01-03 02:05:41 UTC  

lmao

2020-01-03 02:05:59 UTC  

nice stinking fish attack, evidence precedes claims

2020-01-03 02:06:50 UTC  

claims contain evidence...

2020-01-03 02:06:56 UTC  

it's also a red herring and an ad hominem. I do not take those as higher forms of communication. If you truly believe you "destroyed" someone i hope you used more valid arguments

2020-01-03 02:07:22 UTC  

Whats up with these r/iamverysmart lads who keep on misusing fallacies?

2020-01-03 02:07:33 UTC  

Fallacy Fallacy

2020-01-03 02:07:42 UTC  

Adhomining means insulting instead of addressing arguments

2020-01-03 02:07:45 UTC  

i addressed your argument

2020-01-03 02:07:48 UTC  

and i never insulted you

2020-01-03 02:08:00 UTC  

Claiming a fallacy against someone does not make their argument invalid

2020-01-03 02:08:20 UTC  

It is an insult to claim i got destroyed with an argument from motion.

2020-01-03 02:08:32 UTC  

under what definition of insult are you operating

2020-01-03 02:09:55 UTC  

fairly certain that if your claim was true, that you have interacted with me before, then you also know what you experienced as potential thumbscrews. I keep insults under the definition of untrue claims about another, used intentionally to offend the target

2020-01-03 02:10:20 UTC  

Your non-evidence based claims are insulting to me