Message from @Sentient23
Discord ID: 662476345283969056
By what definitions?
@Clincoin capitalism is a threat to culture
Depends on what culture you speak of <a:shruganimated:421995622346784768>
Replaces trad buildings with concrete monstrosities
yes
F WORD black culture
It replaces all cultures with copy pasted mcculture
I thought no shitposting in <#587028275918929925> was a thing...
im not shitposting im genuinely racist
Arguments, not statements
arguments are statements
statements are not arguments
Yes?
all statements are argument
s
@Clincoin he's just agreeing with me
What definition of argument are u operating under?
```im not shitposting im genuinely racist
``` Bruh
and arguments do in my book have to bear meaning or intent
not related to the question at hand
yes it is related to the question at hand since you sadi "depends on what culture"
oh wait
lmao
youre that guy who didnt ban the dude that posted gore on ur server
And that then banned me because i destroyed you with the argument from motion
lmao
nice stinking fish attack, evidence precedes claims
claims contain evidence...
it's also a red herring and an ad hominem. I do not take those as higher forms of communication. If you truly believe you "destroyed" someone i hope you used more valid arguments
Whats up with these r/iamverysmart lads who keep on misusing fallacies?
Fallacy Fallacy
Adhomining means insulting instead of addressing arguments
i addressed your argument
and i never insulted you
Claiming a fallacy against someone does not make their argument invalid
It is an insult to claim i got destroyed with an argument from motion.
under what definition of insult are you operating
fairly certain that if your claim was true, that you have interacted with me before, then you also know what you experienced as potential thumbscrews. I keep insults under the definition of untrue claims about another, used intentionally to offend the target
Your non-evidence based claims are insulting to me