Message from @Charlie H. Inkie
Discord ID: 674998828180439061
if you gave the students the right to vote for their teacher, they'd vote for the one that gives the highest grade for the least bit of work
voters in a democracy think along the same principles, they don't care about the survival of the state or the people inside it.
if there was a candidate that promised to give all hobos housing and food for life at the expense of the rich i can bet you every single hobo would vote for him
@Koninos you realize that democracy isn't democratic, right? There is no way to best represent the will of the people when you have two factions that are loyal more to donors than they are to the People because every x number of years there's a peaceful revolution (election) that destroys the progress that was made under one side of the kosher sandwich
Serious political discussion is intellectual masturbation. Embrace retardation as the only serious way forward
Before you say this is a shitpost, I’m being 100% serious
I agree
I wholeheartedly support acting like an actual downy when confronted with any form of degeneracy
tard screech against the modern world
Thank you
They are fighting a war for your mind
But they cannot win if you have lost your mind
precisely
they will not try to conquer what they see as unworthy to conquer
No
Just be monkey
You misunderstand monkey
no yeah that's the point
if you are a tard they leave you alone
and then you win because of your tard strength
@Charlie H. Inkie in a way i agree with you
the only way to make change is to do the dumb thing in a political environment
because the masses are generally dumb and don't care about any high intellectual discussion
@Koninos Democracy institutionalises corruption. A ruler providing resources and privileges vastly disproportionately to his loyalists is usually considered corrupt historically, but that's the expectation with democracy, we just don't consider it corruption in the same way.
The main reason it seems less corrupt is because both systems are judged by different standards - with monarchic or oligarchic systems judged more harshly, or recategorising corruption as part of the benefit, eg. benefiting the majority (but this is rarely synonymous with benefiting the nation generally)
It’s more than that
I’m going to be a smartoid here for a moment
But when politicians get on stage, it’s not to inform the public, but to use sophistry to manipulate them into supporting globohetero
We would learn just as much as if they were to get up there and make monkey noises
Monkey noises highlight the absurdity of modern discourse
And it can also be used to be racist against brown people, which is a plus
@Koninos Democracy is at blame because under democracy you cannot have an authoritarian government, therefore you cannot solve the problems you have. Solving problems is extremely easy if you can mobilize the resources to do so, problem is that in democracies the government is weak. The individuals often only care about problems that affect them, therefore not solving anything due to the high ammount of individuals. Furthermore this disagreement cause by self interest creates more problems as none are solved. As i previously stated democracies dont work for the people, they are only useful to keep them dormant and take away their resources.
@OrthoGoat tldr smartoid
Democracies are inefficient, they are only good if used to abuse people for resources
Yes
If your point cannot be summarized in under 20 words, you don’t understand it
If I have a belief system which does not allow me to leave speak anywhere in public without being mobbed by NGO protesters, and my opponent is the owner of all the major newspapers, whos interest is in prohibiting the people from even having the ability to hear me, the people can hardly be said to have made a choice.
One of the reasons socrates criticized democracy was because Greeks became decadent and voted based on social popularity/pop culture.
That’s the entire point