Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 684129152231800849
I didn't say you were
well you said it was human nature, and im human thus id be bound by that rule, and im evidently not since i havent derailed
are you going to answer my question though?
Its a simple yes or no question
I will answer your question
Alright, lets see it
I did answer it.
Quote yourself.
There is nothing wrong with my answer of previous
That idealism is a tool of mass control
I demonstrated what's wrong with your previous argument
And I still don't understand your criticism
You're typing in fucking hebrew
Your argument presupposes the falsity of the conclusion it aims to rebut, in one of its propositions
Let me clear this up for you
Appreciate it
Click <#587029719162290176>
Suppose that i believe morality is objective.
You asked me to back that up
And I, in one of the premises in the argument i aim to use to substantiate my claim that morality is objective, ASSUME that morality is objective
So, proposition X is true because Y and Z, and Y is true because X is true. this would be a circular argument and not a coherent refutation
I don't understand why you're struggling with this, its quite simple
So you're asking me to use a situation where idealism is true to argue the falsity of idealism
No, I'm asking for an argument against idealism, in which one of the propositions of such argument doesn't presuppose the truth value of your conclusion
Oh
Is serious spelled right
Yes
I'm having a stroke
It doesn't look right
Well I can't think like that right now @Sentient23
Let me rephrase it again in mathematical terms
I've got ideas floating in my head but
No no
I get you
I'm dismissing idealism with the mindset of idealism being already dismissed
I can't think right now
Proposition X
Argument for proposition X: Y, Z, and D
Argument for statements in the argument for proposition X: Y is true because X
alright
I get you though
Your logic is strong
Although I still gotta prove your logic too
I'm gonna go to the shops I'll be back
Alright, ill go to bed right now anyway