Message from @Light

Discord ID: 661439519333285954


2019-12-31 05:21:49 UTC  

I mean, a handful of sources make sense in some cases

2019-12-31 05:21:52 UTC  

David Reimer’s story was absolutely awful.

2019-12-31 05:21:56 UTC  

He suffered.

2019-12-31 05:21:57 UTC  

Scientific method is not always the solution to problems

2019-12-31 05:21:58 UTC  

Especially if you're looking at individual stuff

2019-12-31 05:22:11 UTC  

John Money... what?

2019-12-31 05:22:19 UTC  

@Deleted User May he rest in peace. Lord knows he deserved none of what was brought to him...

2019-12-31 05:22:31 UTC  

John Money has been criticized in recent times

2019-12-31 05:22:34 UTC  

Quite a bit

2019-12-31 05:22:38 UTC  

He also wasn't the "creator"

2019-12-31 05:22:40 UTC  

Rightfully so

2019-12-31 05:22:46 UTC  

of said fields of study

2019-12-31 05:23:09 UTC  

Also, John Money's "study" wherein some boy was forced to transition...

2019-12-31 05:23:10 UTC  

He was the creator of Gender. But he is also a pedophile and child abuser.

2019-12-31 05:23:11 UTC  

Failed

2019-12-31 05:23:13 UTC  

John Money is, in summation, a pedophile and a prominent peddler of the “gender spectrum.” The study of which ultimately blasted back into his face after Reimer decided to turn back.

2019-12-31 05:23:25 UTC  

As a consequence, it arguably *proves* that gender identity is innate

2019-12-31 05:23:30 UTC  

I feel so fucking bad for Reimer

2019-12-31 05:23:55 UTC  

It only goes to show that men like him deserve to be shot/hung/burnt alive

2019-12-31 05:24:08 UTC  

There are a lot of ways to kill a man, but he deserves them all

2019-12-31 05:24:30 UTC  

And, as people are trans, I'd continue, *proves* that people aren't always born to the correct gender

2019-12-31 05:25:26 UTC  

Brings me solace that horrid men will be brought to their appropriate layer of hell

2019-12-31 05:25:37 UTC  

Not really, the spectrum is on par with the absurdity of creationism, which is peddled and promoted less by scientists and actual geneticists, than by social “scientists” who hardly earned the distinction of their baccalaureates.

2019-12-31 05:26:17 UTC  

That’s because actual geneticists will be refused by the media

2019-12-31 05:26:35 UTC  

There is no genetic evidence to suggest that there is more than one sex

2019-12-31 05:26:40 UTC  

It depends on what you define as "gender"

2019-12-31 05:26:47 UTC  

In the common language, gender being sex

2019-12-31 05:26:56 UTC  

Gender is a fallacy in the first place. I refuse to use the term.

2019-12-31 05:26:56 UTC  

Well, besides intersex people - sure, two sexes

2019-12-31 05:27:01 UTC  

nobody's going to disagree with you

2019-12-31 05:27:22 UTC  

Intersex people are just malfunctions from the birthing process

2019-12-31 05:27:23 UTC  

What do you want to use instead, then?

2019-12-31 05:27:34 UTC  

So they can’t really be registered

2019-12-31 05:27:36 UTC  

To discuss expression of characteristics associated with sexes

2019-12-31 05:27:46 UTC  

In social and physical senses

2019-12-31 05:27:51 UTC  

The word sex is appropriate in all of the terms

2019-12-31 05:27:58 UTC  

So, sex expression?

2019-12-31 05:28:00 UTC  

Is that good?

2019-12-31 05:28:05 UTC  

You either are or you aren’t. To be or not to be.

2019-12-31 05:28:34 UTC  

One may pretend to be female, but he is never truly.

2019-12-31 05:28:47 UTC  

The entire “gender spectrum” play is derived from a combination of mental gymnastics and pseudoscience.