Message from @Light
Discord ID: 661438883069820938
Some are just developing fields, or more fragile
Scientific method cannot prove all things. That’s why i respect people like Einstein because he understood this.
Howso?
Physicists are truly the most chad scientists
Theoretical stuff, I suppose
But even then, in theory, it could still be proven
@Light I mean, you can more or less distinguish who writes what between the two categories of my aforementioned topics. The former is typically written by a science student or graduate who incorporates 10+ footnotes in a single paragraph supporting the facts of which, the latter sounds more like the raging boner of some soy who somehow manages to make an even longer article have less citations.
There’s a very clear distinction in quality.
"aforementioned topics" being "hard" and "soft" sciences, I presume?
My view on it is that the conclusion part of the scientific method can be altered with opinion
Soft sciences are still valid
They're just more fledgling fields, and significantly easier for laymen to interpret
No, I was referencing to my previous claim.
Well before this discussion on the sciences.
Ah, wikipedia stuff
As i’ve said, John Money, the creator of Gender abused two biological boys because he believed on could be turned into a female through social changes. He considered it a success, yet both boys ended up committing suicide.
I mean, a handful of sources make sense in some cases
David Reimer’s story was absolutely awful.
He suffered.
Scientific method is not always the solution to problems
John Money... what?
@Deleted User May he rest in peace. Lord knows he deserved none of what was brought to him...
John Money has been criticized in recent times
Quite a bit
He also wasn't the "creator"
Rightfully so
of said fields of study
Also, John Money's "study" wherein some boy was forced to transition...
He was the creator of Gender. But he is also a pedophile and child abuser.
Failed
John Money is, in summation, a pedophile and a prominent peddler of the “gender spectrum.” The study of which ultimately blasted back into his face after Reimer decided to turn back.
As a consequence, it arguably *proves* that gender identity is innate
I feel so fucking bad for Reimer
It only goes to show that men like him deserve to be shot/hung/burnt alive
There are a lot of ways to kill a man, but he deserves them all
And, as people are trans, I'd continue, *proves* that people aren't always born to the correct gender
Brings me solace that horrid men will be brought to their appropriate layer of hell
Not really, the spectrum is on par with the absurdity of creationism, which is peddled and promoted less by scientists and actual geneticists, than by social “scientists” who hardly earned the distinction of their baccalaureates.
That’s because actual geneticists will be refused by the media
There is no genetic evidence to suggest that there is more than one sex