My view on it is that the conclusion part of the scientific method can be altered with opinion

Soft sciences are still valid

They're just more fledgling fields, and significantly easier for laymen to interpret

No, I was referencing to my previous claim.

Well before this discussion on the sciences.

Ah, wikipedia stuff

As i’ve said, John Money, the creator of Gender abused two biological boys because he believed on could be turned into a female through social changes. He considered it a success, yet both boys ended up committing suicide.

I mean, a handful of sources make sense in some cases

David Reimer’s story was absolutely awful.

He suffered.

Scientific method is not always the solution to problems

Especially if you're looking at individual stuff

John Money... what?

@Deleted User May he rest in peace. Lord knows he deserved none of what was brought to him...

John Money has been criticized in recent times

Quite a bit

He also wasn't the "creator"

Rightfully so

of said fields of study

Also, John Money's "study" wherein some boy was forced to transition...

He was the creator of Gender. But he is also a pedophile and child abuser.

Failed

John Money is, in summation, a pedophile and a prominent peddler of the “gender spectrum.” The study of which ultimately blasted back into his face after Reimer decided to turn back.

As a consequence, it arguably *proves* that gender identity is innate

I feel so fucking bad for Reimer

It only goes to show that men like him deserve to be shot/hung/burnt alive

There are a lot of ways to kill a man, but he deserves them all

And, as people are trans, I'd continue, *proves* that people aren't always born to the correct gender

Brings me solace that horrid men will be brought to their appropriate layer of hell

Not really, the spectrum is on par with the absurdity of creationism, which is peddled and promoted less by scientists and actual geneticists, than by social “scientists” who hardly earned the distinction of their baccalaureates.

That’s because actual geneticists will be refused by the media

There is no genetic evidence to suggest that there is more than one sex

It depends on what you define as "gender"

In the common language, gender being sex

Gender is a fallacy in the first place. I refuse to use the term.

Well, besides intersex people - sure, two sexes

nobody's going to disagree with you

Intersex people are just malfunctions from the birthing process

What do you want to use instead, then?

So they can’t really be registered

To discuss expression of characteristics associated with sexes