Message from @Wally
Discord ID: 662443122172624969
- and lost.
To organized government.
Sure, I'm not an anarchist
I'm not defending that
The point I'm trying to get across is that men aren't loyal to the state
Masculinity doesn't induce loyalty to the state
You can argue that rebellions constitute another "state", but that "state" is in contrast with the original state
So what?
That's the point
No anarchist opposes government ironically
You'll get an opposition to a monopoly on arbitration or force, but that doesn't change anything
Okay?
I was trying to emphasize that masculinity is just merely aggression, not really... "loyalty"
Well higher masculinity exhibit a disproportionate intolerance for submission to the state.
Men compose the ranks of authoritarian armies and police forces
Well, generally
The exceptions don't make rules when generalizing
Really only the CNT FAI's zones of control were true revolutions
.
That sounds like a feminist depiction of masculinity and is therefore wrong because it is feminist.
Though, I do agree that masculinity is not defined as loyalty towards one's authority. That's just silly.
Equating masculinity to being pro-state is just as correct as stating that masculinity is simply more violent.
I will say that masculinity is generally more driven and authoritative than femininity and usually renders less agreeableness
And yes, this could mean that men would be more driven to power
And that men can be more aggressive, but that isn't always the case.
You have Hilary Clinton for example.
There has been no man more driven to authority and violence than hillary clinton.
Hillary is a gilf
Ew
Gae
Wanting to fuck hillary clinton is gae as fuck.
shes so hot ngl
omg boner
fuck this bitch ass
Wow
๐๐ผ
cum, ok? @sabrinaisheresometime ss
?
@Sentient23 This ainโt good. The US just bombed a member of the bloody IRGC.