Message from @Anon365
Discord ID: 531239663281897482
Which helped the consumer
Monopolies barely exist in a free market
He did get into price wars, in which he lowered prices to drive competitors out of business
And a bad monopoly does not exist
yes and he kept prices down
But he would raise prices once they were done
No evidence to support that
As soon as he would, competition would come in
There was an overall lowering trend as crude oil itself got cheaper
Not really
Standard oil did not control the oil extraction business anyways
All the aforementioned tactics basically dissuaded all but the most local competition
yes really
Yes he didn’t raise prices due to him fearing competition
They were more horizontally integrated than vertically integrated, yes
It would have been like that for ever
He often did raise prices
That’s why prices fell
He only lowered it when there was serious competition, a new market to expand into, or an internal cost savings
Monopoly prices in kerosene and other products made by Standard Oil would have simply been replaced with substitute goods which Standard Oil did not control.
They artificially sky rocketed diamond prices
No idea about de beers
So I’ll look into that
They're a diamond company who had a monopoly
And btw when in the year of the Supreme Court decision
Standard oil had 150 competitors
But yes your own graph shows prices fell in general
They started of much higher
Those are crude oil prices
Not refined product
Misred
But they did fall
As I said
Diamonds aren't even rare
Infact , Standard Oil had no initial market power, with only about 4 percent of the market in 1870.
But De Beers set their prices insanely high
They also spread campaigns that got us to propose with diamond rings
My point was that falling crude oil prices were the main drive behind Rockefeller’s drops in refined oil prices
