Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
Discord ID: 535173069518405633
And doing these tax hikes will be accompanied with increased spending which will shift the burden into the middle class
I dunno why the democrats are against a 5.7B wall that actually helps America but are okay with 150B to Iran hoping that they don’t continue to try and develop WMD’s
It would increase revenue though
And how does spending the tax receipts from the highest income earners shift the burden to the middle class
Because you’re not getting the actual tax from 70%
You’d be getting 35% odd
So the shift of the spending would go down towards the middle class more
since the top don’t pay anymore
And raising taxes after a certain point decreases revenue
Laffer curve
Yes; the most accepted point for that critical point is 70%
And can you explain more on how the spending would “go down” toward the middle class?
No it's not
there is no "most accepted"
we don't know what the tax rate is
@Leo (BillNyeLand) Because since you increased spending on the hopes of the tax revenue rising due to the 70% tax rate. However the actual tax paid was around 35%. This is not even close to what was predicted, thus the cost goes down the middle class.
Remove tax abatements
But no one expects an *effective* tax rate of 70%
If they wanted an effective rate of 70%, they would set an effective rate of 70%. But they only want a *marginal* rate of 70%.
And government should live within its long-term means anyways, but that’s unrelated to the current or proposed tax rate.
thats the whole point
mostlikely would try to close loopholes
Which will result in a crash
They can close loopholes
yes and that increases the tax rate closer to 70%
Which is a crash
And AOC herself said she knew 70% marginal wasn’t 70% effective
And intended the former and not the latter
where
Nobody says "effective tax"
they want to tax the rich 70%
but herself and bernie do not understand marginal tax rates doesn't mean the tax is paid at that rate
Where does it say
effective
“That doesn’t mean all $10M are taxed at an extremely high rate”
Only the money after the first $10M
the phrase after is important
Yes
she makes no distinction between effective or not
