oof

Hahahahaha!

You people have been saying you have proof around the corner for two years. Nothing. You still have nothing.
The Gates stuff is a flop. Butina has been accused of attempting, not successfully establishing any “ back channels “. Another dead end.

You people keep telling yourselves these fairy tails. It’s sad.

The way I see it, there's sufficient evidence to suspect that investigations into collusion have not revealed everything about the situation just yet. Is it possible there is 0 intentional connection between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin? Absolutely, but there is evidence that would suggest investigating to make sure. All I care about is that the investigation continues.

Which, at this point, basically means asking Trump and his son what happened under oath. I mean, that's mostly what's missing at this point right?

So the conservative talking point of "there's no proof" is true, that's why the investigation continues

But despite there being no proof, you'd have to be willfully ignorant to ignore the possible connections.

There is a massive grey area between something that is proven untrue and something that is proven true. We are somewhere in between.

The investigation was started over a bar conversation and the Steele dossier.

Regardless, these things have already been investigated. That and a bunch of other red herrings. It’s pathetic, and not only should it never had begun, it should have been over a long time ago.

This is the fastest moving special council investigation in history in terms of indictments/year. This is not going on too long, it's moving at the pace it needs to move at. The Steele dossier, as controversial as it has been, has not been proven untrue at any point. In addition, these things have not "already been investigated," as they are currently...being investigated...by Mueller.

<https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-russia-investigation-is-moving-really-freaking-fast/> source for the speed of the investigation

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Russia_dossier> source for the dossier integrity

Yes it has. It uses news articles to independently verify Steele claims. He was the source of the information. It also made false claims about where some people where at specific times. You’re wrong

The pee pee stuff is hilariously stupid.

Link me. To my knowledge, nothing from the Steele dossier has been disproven, as demonstrated by my source.

It’s completely unverified in any of the claims it makes.

Like I said, things that are unverified are not proven incorrect

and no, it is not completely unverified

This is how I know I'm saying something fairly accurate lol

Oh no my words are gone!

dang

guess the truth is gone with it

Fitting

yo @FriarPop can we not have this ^^

the tag is still there you dingus

Anyway

The dossier falsely claims that Cohen was in Prague . And like I said, it uses news articles as independent proof that Steele was right. The article sources were Steele himself

I'm not saying the sources used in the Steele dossier are true, I'm saying they have been corroborated since. There's also no evidence Cohen wasn't in Prague other than him saying he wasn't.

But anyway @Exiled Sentinel I don't think we can continue this conversation with the asshats in the room, sorry.

who else needs banned?

anyone spamming huge images? <@203965572420075520> <@168060466529173505>

So basically you think an Multiple year long investigation should run on rumors supplied by intelligence mercenaries paid by the DNC? @wahx is that really a wise standard?

thanks @FriarPop !

👍🏼

No lol, I think a multiple year long investigation should be an investigation that finds its own sources, like all investigations. Trump's own department of Justice thought there was enough information to start the investigation right? I just want it continued at its own pace.

I don't think the Steele dossier should be the primary source, of course not

I consider the Steele dossier as just an interesting piece of information that has questionable accuracy right now.

It was though. You can see it’s the vast majority of the FISA memo. It’s the bulk of it. And they haven’t found anything to add to it in years.

They haven't *released* anything to add to it in years

How many more years until you say it’s gone on long enough? @wahx

Because they haven't released any reports

I can't answer that