Message from @Exiled Sentinel
Discord ID: 509843334425083904
So the conservative talking point of "there's no proof" is true, that's why the investigation continues
But despite there being no proof, you'd have to be willfully ignorant to ignore the possible connections.
There is a massive grey area between something that is proven untrue and something that is proven true. We are somewhere in between.
The investigation was started over a bar conversation and the Steele dossier.
Regardless, these things have already been investigated. That and a bunch of other red herrings. It’s pathetic, and not only should it never had begun, it should have been over a long time ago.
This is the fastest moving special council investigation in history in terms of indictments/year. This is not going on too long, it's moving at the pace it needs to move at. The Steele dossier, as controversial as it has been, has not been proven untrue at any point. In addition, these things have not "already been investigated," as they are currently...being investigated...by Mueller.
<https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-russia-investigation-is-moving-really-freaking-fast/> source for the speed of the investigation
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Russia_dossier> source for the dossier integrity
Yes it has. It uses news articles to independently verify Steele claims. He was the source of the information. It also made false claims about where some people where at specific times. You’re wrong
The pee pee stuff is hilariously stupid.
Link me. To my knowledge, nothing from the Steele dossier has been disproven, as demonstrated by my source.
It’s completely unverified in any of the claims it makes.
Like I said, things that are unverified are not proven incorrect
and no, it is not completely unverified
This is how I know I'm saying something fairly accurate lol
Oh no my words are gone!
dang
guess the truth is gone with it
Fitting
the tag is still there you dingus
The dossier falsely claims that Cohen was in Prague . And like I said, it uses news articles as independent proof that Steele was right. The article sources were Steele himself
I'm not saying the sources used in the Steele dossier are true, I'm saying they have been corroborated since. There's also no evidence Cohen wasn't in Prague other than him saying he wasn't.
But anyway @Exiled Sentinel I don't think we can continue this conversation with the asshats in the room, sorry.
who else needs banned?
anyone spamming huge images? <@203965572420075520> <@168060466529173505>
So basically you think an Multiple year long investigation should run on rumors supplied by intelligence mercenaries paid by the DNC? @wahx is that really a wise standard?
👍🏼
No lol, I think a multiple year long investigation should be an investigation that finds its own sources, like all investigations. Trump's own department of Justice thought there was enough information to start the investigation right? I just want it continued at its own pace.
I don't think the Steele dossier should be the primary source, of course not
I consider the Steele dossier as just an interesting piece of information that has questionable accuracy right now.
It was though. You can see it’s the vast majority of the FISA memo. It’s the bulk of it. And they haven’t found anything to add to it in years.
They haven't *released* anything to add to it in years
How many more years until you say it’s gone on long enough? @wahx
Because they haven't released any reports
I can't answer that
watergate took what... 6 years? is that right?
how long was the clinton investigation for?
this shit takes so long lol
Watergate had an actual crime.