Trump is shitting himself right now

but Mueller is tightening that noose!

his investigation has gotten so large, and so full of evidence, several matters have been given to different offices

https://twitter.com/DavidKris/status/1053407441843499008
Here is one world-leading expert, former AAG for National Security at DOJ's observations

https://twitter.com/DavidKris/status/1035633291955720193 this back in Aug of this year, when it was 4

@MikeHaydenOnCoffeeBreak no American has been charged or convicted with the crime of illegal collusion with Russia. Never happened.

And that was both rounds of indictments.

might want to learn what superseding indictments means. We know thanks to the Muller investigation, in Court filings that several of Trump's inner-circle has been confirmed in talking with GRU agents, and others during the election.
he can hold off on these until he wants to make them public, or gains further evidence. But already it exists publicly, under Court record.
Ooof, sucks to be a trumptard

and this is just ONE example. In the recent indictment against the Russian sleeper agent, Butina, she was EXPOSED has setting up back channels to the GOP, including Trump's transition team itself

so while there were no formal chargers (yet), it clearly is the case in the public record collusion has already been proven to trump's inner circle.

oof

Hahahahaha!

You people have been saying you have proof around the corner for two years. Nothing. You still have nothing.
The Gates stuff is a flop. Butina has been accused of attempting, not successfully establishing any “ back channels “. Another dead end.

You people keep telling yourselves these fairy tails. It’s sad.

The way I see it, there's sufficient evidence to suspect that investigations into collusion have not revealed everything about the situation just yet. Is it possible there is 0 intentional connection between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin? Absolutely, but there is evidence that would suggest investigating to make sure. All I care about is that the investigation continues.

Which, at this point, basically means asking Trump and his son what happened under oath. I mean, that's mostly what's missing at this point right?

So the conservative talking point of "there's no proof" is true, that's why the investigation continues

But despite there being no proof, you'd have to be willfully ignorant to ignore the possible connections.

There is a massive grey area between something that is proven untrue and something that is proven true. We are somewhere in between.

The investigation was started over a bar conversation and the Steele dossier.

Regardless, these things have already been investigated. That and a bunch of other red herrings. It’s pathetic, and not only should it never had begun, it should have been over a long time ago.

This is the fastest moving special council investigation in history in terms of indictments/year. This is not going on too long, it's moving at the pace it needs to move at. The Steele dossier, as controversial as it has been, has not been proven untrue at any point. In addition, these things have not "already been investigated," as they are currently...being investigated...by Mueller.

<https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-russia-investigation-is-moving-really-freaking-fast/> source for the speed of the investigation

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Russia_dossier> source for the dossier integrity

Yes it has. It uses news articles to independently verify Steele claims. He was the source of the information. It also made false claims about where some people where at specific times. You’re wrong

The pee pee stuff is hilariously stupid.

Link me. To my knowledge, nothing from the Steele dossier has been disproven, as demonstrated by my source.

It’s completely unverified in any of the claims it makes.

Like I said, things that are unverified are not proven incorrect

and no, it is not completely unverified

This is how I know I'm saying something fairly accurate lol

Oh no my words are gone!

dang

guess the truth is gone with it

Fitting

yo @FriarPop can we not have this ^^

the tag is still there you dingus

Anyway

The dossier falsely claims that Cohen was in Prague . And like I said, it uses news articles as independent proof that Steele was right. The article sources were Steele himself

I'm not saying the sources used in the Steele dossier are true, I'm saying they have been corroborated since. There's also no evidence Cohen wasn't in Prague other than him saying he wasn't.

But anyway @Exiled Sentinel I don't think we can continue this conversation with the asshats in the room, sorry.

who else needs banned?

anyone spamming huge images? <@203965572420075520> <@168060466529173505>

So basically you think an Multiple year long investigation should run on rumors supplied by intelligence mercenaries paid by the DNC? @wahx is that really a wise standard?