Message from @wahx

Discord ID: 537083360049102853


2019-01-22 01:31:37 UTC  

Many illegal immigrants (if I recall correctly) come from visa overstays

2019-01-22 01:31:45 UTC  

yea

2019-01-22 01:31:47 UTC  

around 50%

2019-01-22 01:32:03 UTC  

or 27% if i remember correctly

2019-01-22 01:32:33 UTC  

Yeah a big chunk from Spain

2019-01-22 01:32:41 UTC  

Damn European Mexicans!

2019-01-22 01:33:39 UTC  

So they have documents but they become illegal when they don’t leave

2019-01-22 01:33:51 UTC  

Mhm

2019-01-22 01:34:52 UTC  

Which do you think would be a cheaper way to reduce the number of illegals: building, operating, and maintaining one of the biggest borders that exist between countries, or doing immigration reform to take care of visa overstays?

2019-01-22 01:35:12 UTC  

you realize if you do one it boosts the other

2019-01-22 01:35:15 UTC  

so you need both

2019-01-22 01:35:39 UTC  

They’re connected, but funded and operated differently. So we can focus on one

2019-01-22 01:35:46 UTC  

no

2019-01-22 01:35:48 UTC  

what im saying is

2019-01-22 01:35:56 UTC  

if you build a wall there will be more visa overstays

2019-01-22 01:36:02 UTC  

or if you fix the visa overstays

2019-01-22 01:36:05 UTC  

more crossings

2019-01-22 01:37:02 UTC  

Just have satellite lasers to vaporize any illegals crossing the border

2019-01-22 01:37:03 UTC  

What? These are different things. You’re confused, you have to get in legally to be a visa overstay. If you could do that, there’s no reason to come illegally. But you wouldn’t not come if you got a visa, and I’m not saying to reduce visa numbers, just visa overstay ability

2019-01-22 01:37:27 UTC  

thats literally my point

2019-01-22 01:37:31 UTC  

Lmao we need more lasers in general

2019-01-22 01:37:51 UTC  

But my point is that reducing visa overstays does not affect illegal immigration

2019-01-22 01:37:54 UTC  

Laser guns

2019-01-22 01:38:12 UTC  

They’re from Europe! They can’t get back illegally lmao

2019-01-22 01:38:16 UTC  

It would probably have *an* effect, but only a very *small* effect

2019-01-22 01:38:16 UTC  

Ok im probably just not saying what I mean correctly

2019-01-22 01:38:29 UTC  

True Visitor

2019-01-22 01:38:40 UTC  

Because visa overstayers and illegal border crossers tend to be very different people

2019-01-22 01:38:48 UTC  

true

2019-01-22 01:38:53 UTC  

Exactly. And one is cheaper to deal with

2019-01-22 01:39:01 UTC  

my point is just

2019-01-22 01:39:25 UTC  

if you make visa overstaying harder more people are likely to try it and just go for the border crossing

2019-01-22 01:39:35 UTC  

or if you make the crossing harder more people will go for the visa overstay

2019-01-22 01:39:41 UTC  

But they’re already in the states haha

2019-01-22 01:39:51 UTC  

And they can’t get visas if they’re crossing illegally lol

2019-01-22 01:39:58 UTC  

oh my fucking god

2019-01-22 01:40:03 UTC  

how do you not understand

2019-01-22 01:40:08 UTC  

They’re fundamentally different people dude

2019-01-22 01:40:29 UTC  

Almost by definition

2019-01-22 01:40:43 UTC  

okay

2019-01-22 01:40:47 UTC  

It seems to me that the number of people who would switch from border crossing to visa overstay (or vice versa) would be pretty small compared to the number of people who would do so anyway