Message from @The Librarian
Discord ID: 659607232895254528
@Shattered if you are referring to a global scale then you are correct, but at a local scale, those countries do conduct in a free-market system
Nobody is going to "Collectively Own" Anything that I own.
Yeah Capitalism has its flaws, but replacing private ownership with a collective ownership is retarded and would never work.
People like Bernie Sanders need to get their head out of their asses, we will NEVER go to a collective ownership system with Democratic Socialism.
are you capable of understanding the difference between socialism and social democracy?
Yes.
I understand what they are perfectly.
some public ownership makes sense
For what?
natural monopolies
Why should someone collective own something if it wasn't their company to begin with, if they didn't build it up from nothing?
because there are things where competition is impossible
would you please be more specific @Shattered
How does that affect competition?
If a group of people own something rather then a single person.
@The Librarian railway system
There will always be people at the top, no matter what the form of government is.
that's not a natural system
There will always be multi-million dollar companies that have a monopoly on things.
Collective Ownership could only work in that case, and not on a personal level.
gov ownership, not collective
nationalized
Thats even fucking worse.
Freight distribution is own by public companies
collective is impossible
Thats democratic socalism right there.
IMPOSSIBLE.
It doesnt work.
*sigh*
americans
look at europe, in austria the rails are owned by the gov
in germany its private
in germany its expensive as hell because they can raise costs, theres no competition on THEIR rails
only Amtrak is operated by the goverment
Its not the governments place to own shit.
Goverment owned schools are shit.
you cannot just build more rails
next to the others
thats bullshit
actually you can with government permission