Message from @Men Are Human
Discord ID: 523524259809722422
I'll have to see about it later, I've been kinda screwed over for writing this week. Had the landlord in ripping the house apart with masive wall-coring drill. It's like being stuck in a dentist. Lol
It's all done now, so I should be back on the horse today or tomorrow. I'm really looking forward to reading this properly
Just launched a new article on Men Are Human @everyone !
That has one significant omission unless a previous article has discussed it
Give that a read. While the wikipedia page specifically calls out affirmative action, any "ameliorative" reason can be given for a discriminatory law
basically this has its roots in the charter of rights in 1982, though specific wording saying that discriminating against men is ok might have been from the Employment Equity Act that is mentioned (1995/1986)
Thanks a lot. Do you want to write up a patch for the article? Or maybe a follow up
Hrm...I'm not sure. That's something I'd more discuss with BlueOrange22. The article stands on its own quite well, despite what I said. It would be possible to mention this at the bottom of "how this happened", referencing how the law doens't violate the charter despite the charter guaranteeing sexual equality under the law on account of the broad exception of section 15.2. Or one could make a paragraph towards the bottom of "It Gets Worse", noting that this is part of a long Canadian trend of creating trapdoors to avoid gender equality.
BlueOrange22 isn't here under that name though
Come to think of it, if he's Canadian, he may have omitted it on purpose to focus on the Employment Equity Act since it happened only a few years after the Charter.
Basically "it's all fun and games until someone gets equality" (loved that article) is a Canadian thing too, only in the case of Employment Equity feminists have been more careful about avoiding it so that someone like the NCFM can't fix things through litigation. (link: https://menarehuman.com/all-fun-and-games/)
@asparkofpyrokravte Thanks, I'm glad to hear you liked it. :) Maybe this should be a separate article. Basically a 'how the hell did this happen?'
Honestly, there isn't much more to discuss in a separate article though
You might be right, though I was thinking it could cover other times they have done this
That's the only other fact, so one'd just be drawing a narrative of how gender equality activists have been careful about avoiding mandating equality for *everyone*
Hmmm
I think you could build that case, though I will add the note when I get home
This being unlike similar countries of course. I'd hate writing an article with so few concrete things though.
In the states they really were actually serious about equality though, and in a national amendment no less
And some states (California) even more so
Hey @Men Are Human , you said this article: https://menarehuman.com/sexism-vs-boys-part-1/ got a great response in you reddit post. Where was that response?
Was it elsewhere on reddit?
@asparkofpyrokravte it was mainly via email - and people saying it was a good article on gab, and so on. It wasn't a big response, but it was a really good one. I got two or three new stories from it and a bunch of positive remarks.
Nice
There was this especially good one on gab that I liked. I wanted to use it into the next article, but I haven't heard back yet
Okay, could anyone who knows Canadian law give me a quick synopsis of the law they set up beforehand to make it harder for us?
Oh, can anyone confirm we need to alter the location to be specific to Ontario for that same article?
Cucknadian law is stupid
They are a true shining example of gynocentrism
oh, it gets worse
ive been meaning to do another post
All the funds for the girrlss and none for the booiis
but basically, they have one for "disaster preparedness" to and it boils down to men being exlcuding from resources and rescue efforts
That... Isn't fucking ethical
oh, its a real hoot
America should just Anex Canada
Like in the fallout series
@blueorange22 Those assholes...