Message from @Lotad
Discord ID: 531252373822242826
you where a fool for giving power to waman! now my goal to take over the world is one step closer! xD
Lol
I'm sure most people would just call me token women to that, lol
@Men Are Human i agree with @goodmod on it
The logo we have is simpler and on point
I agree with @InsaneCaterpilla that the female symbol is unnecessary.
@Abbysol Didn't you or someone change their name to that at one point? XD
you thinking of Token Feminist? pretty sure that was PM
Oh, never mind then lol
@Men Are Human Be sure to link that review on the sub!
Keep the symbol simple, IMO. Think of the very biggest logos, a 7 year old can draw them without picking up the pen (Nike check, McDonald’s Golden Arches)
@goodmod I will do. It's important to call out our own movement. That's something feminists never do.
@blueorange22 Alright then. We'll make it the old symbol, but maybe just create a new and brighter version.
oh no, i wasnt suggesting that lol
i wouldnt mind a new thing
honestly we can probably improve anyway
Oh?
Alright. Lol
@everyone Breaking News! We need an article reporting on this! https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/acis89/men_are_more_disadvantaged_than_women_in_the_uk/?utm_source=reddit-android
:)
There, Canada also does will with the BIGI
The table is a word document: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?type=supplementary&id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0205349.s001
ew
<@&524226120661336076> We need an article investigating this.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/aeiybv/theyre_gearing_up_to_make_it_legal_for_a_wife_to/?utm_source=reddit-android
Be aware that the story there is nothing to do with the UK legislature
Okay. I've got a new Men Are Human article in the works and I need <@&524226120661336076> to take a look if they can. It's very rough around the edges.
Please ignore the dodgy formatting as I copied it out of Wordpress
I have a few possible goals here:
1) To maybe expand the list
2) To try and include more people who aren't feminists, though I could not find any myself annoyingly.
3) To maybe cut down some of the off-topic stuff to shorten it
Some of these are mutually exclusive, but I'm not holding myself to any of them
@Men Are Human I had a little read through it mate. At the start when you talk about experiencing misandry, I would have thought it would be talked about in the context of men experiencing it, not women who feel the hatred themselves, no? Also since it's discussing misandry I would try and go into the fact that misandry is often not recognised as existing, at least in a pharagraph. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's had to actually add the word misandry to my phones/computers dictionary to stop it autocorrecting to something else.
Misandry does make me sad
Thinking about it you could possibly add the misogyny/misandry controversy when adding it to hate crimes.
@InsaneCaterpilla The intro is actually something I'm thinking of totally scrapping
I think it would sound stronger without mentioning the handmaid's tale
I like the first two paragraphs. While the 3rd paragraph does put this into perspective, I'd actually scrap just that connection because we really are talking about the crazies in this one. If that is left out it would end up emphasizing the entertainment-at-crazy/evil aspect...at least until you get into Emily McCombs, which brings us right back to ground-level serious in what feels to me a really well-written way.