Alright then. let's hear what you think

well for starters, a very troubling trend is the bias in grading against boys. This is a systemic disadvantage:

https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/02/16/female-teachers-give-male_n_1281236.html

https://seii.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/SEII-Discussion-Paper-2016.07-Terrier-1.pdf

But how do you addrsss that? IMO there needs to be training and seminars about this, it needs to be part of training. It’s relevant, supported by evidence, and adverse to fair education

http://economics.mit.edu/files/10864 (“Family Disadvantage and the Gender Gap in Behavioral and Educational Outcomes” by David H. Autor, David N. Figlio, Krzysztof Karbownik, Jeffrey Roth, & Melanie Wasserman)
http://www.oecd.org/edu/Education-at-a-Glance-2014.pdf (Education at a Glance 2014 OECD indicators” from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development)
https://archive.is/6Vcug (Washington Post article “Poor boys are falling behind poor girls, and it’s deeply troubling”)
https://archive.is/cOUxS (“The Trouble with Boys: Social Influences and the Gender Gap in Disruptive Behavior” by Marianne Bertrand & Jessica Pan)

You do see it talked about, but not enough. It seems to get very little attention. And it doesn’t seem to be being fixed

There needs to be a standard and mandatory action

Something from the DOE. This kind of thing is their job (for the US)

The UNs programs for education are often very one sided . They, of course, completely ignore areas where boys are the gender with lower enrollment rates

What kind of mandatory action would you be talking about specifically?

It is very easy to say "action"

but in this case the types of actions to be taken can be rather disputable

I like this paper for a description of the types of actions that have been taken: https://equalitycanada.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Exploring-the-Boys-Crises-in-Education.pdf

And while I certainly disagree with some of that paper's conclusions, it does point out rather effectively that there aren't really easy answers here

..

I think one of the best examples of specifics I've gotten is this: http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/meread_andhow.pdf

but that is a lot of "do more of this" rather than some drastic change

its definitely not as simple as a straight legislative action, its not like pension ages, and i would NOT prefer seeing affirmative action for boys

i think its a very deeply embedded societal bias and the solution isnt easy

standardized grading policies for starters

but still, how our essays graded?

education when earning teachers certificate, and standards for that

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/abc831/modern_feminism_vs_nazi_germany/

Feminism and Nazism, a valid comparison or taking it a little too far?

Actually, it's close but a little off

Here's the comparison I make: https://quillette.com/2018/12/18/the-children-of-the-revolution/

It's spookily similar.

Can you draw parallels as male_positive does in that thread between feminism and those talked about in your link?

Absolutly

They operate via fear, using control of the universities and the young

The academics live in terror of them

They are literally cannibalizing their own movement

The entire thing is based on the hunt for 'enemy wrongthinkers'.

They use bullying to control language.

They took over the universities.

Most of their followers were conformists who simply followed along out of fear at the back of the gang.

I could rewrite that article to be a fictionalized account of the future of feminism very easily.

Of course, Nazism is close because authoritarianism is the real key part here.

I think both views have merit. I dont know if presenting such similarities to people uninformed on what feminism does is productive or not, because if you look at something seen as benign and that a lot of people seen as positive and compare it to something that has killed many, many people, they are likely to laugh it off and not do any research into how accurate it is

To be honest, almost all comparisons are like that.

Maybe, when it comes to the uninformed I'm largely on favour of letting facts and what feminists cause or dont care about speak for itself. If they were to be used though, even if it's 100% accurate, I'd rather go with something less extreme

they both operate using something called "milieu control", where they gain power by uniting and inflaming people against a perceived "enemy"; they dehumanize and demonize a class a people using psychological conditioning methods. for feminists today, that enemy class is white/cis white males/etc