Message from @Avistew

Discord ID: 540026894754512920


2019-01-30 04:25:09 UTC  

And the only reason to oppose it would be "I don't want someone to have my genes" which seems very petty if there are parents who want the child

2019-01-30 04:25:29 UTC  

I mean, as long as you don't get hit with having to pay when the people who get the child decide they want money

2019-01-30 04:25:31 UTC  

I don't know why anyone would want to pay to support hordes of babies born in a lab.

2019-01-30 04:25:48 UTC  

I don't see why there would be more than now

2019-01-30 04:26:06 UTC  

I would if that means they don't get killed.

2019-01-30 04:26:12 UTC  

Although it would be best if babies were ONLY grown in a lab, then you wouldn't have one accidentally

2019-01-30 04:26:33 UTC  

Well, yeah, you'd want to reduce unwanted pregnancies

2019-01-30 04:27:05 UTC  

Because the artificial womb has taken all the complications out of having a baby and both parents can choose not to raise it in a world where the sexes have equal rights.

2019-01-30 04:27:23 UTC  

I mean the US has a huge amount of unwanted pregnancies but other countries with better sex ed have way less

2019-01-30 04:27:58 UTC  

Maybe the artificial wombs would be reserved for babies that have parents waiting for them

2019-01-30 04:28:17 UTC  

I would predict the worst crime wave in American history 20 years after the artificial womb.

2019-01-30 04:29:39 UTC  

Pretty much, realistically the idea should be to make it *more* likely that children have both parents, not create a new way for children to only have one parent

2019-01-30 04:29:46 UTC  

Maybe both parents are required to pay child support regardless of weather either one raises it. Problem solved.

2019-01-30 04:30:28 UTC  

Having one parent isn't necessarily a problem if you have a lot of other supportive adults around

2019-01-30 04:31:31 UTC  

This is true. And having no parents around still results in having supporting adults if they are paying your way through adulthood.

2019-01-30 04:31:43 UTC  

But I think we agree in the big picture, that we should start with better education and available birth control. And ideally birth control for men too, and not just permanent one

2019-01-30 04:33:14 UTC  

This is what I support. Men should have a birth control option that is not condoms or abstinence

2019-01-30 04:33:43 UTC  

I've heart about the "heat" method but it's really not practical

2019-01-30 04:33:55 UTC  

Female birth control is already relatively inexpensive (about 50 bucks a month, 1/16th the price of the average abortion)

2019-01-30 04:33:59 UTC  

You have to dip your balls in hot (but bearable) water every day for like 30 minutes

2019-01-30 04:34:04 UTC  

I mean, not realistic

2019-01-30 04:34:11 UTC  

Lack of male BC is a result of market forces and politics that have more to do with the drug industry than equality though.

2019-01-30 04:34:43 UTC  

Yeah, I don't think it's people saying they don't want men to have birth control. I know a lot of women support the idea too, and lots of guys would want the option obviously

2019-01-30 04:35:22 UTC  

Actually not that frequently. I read a chart about how long and how hot to sterilize for X days/months. I think the data was gathered in India.

2019-01-30 04:35:49 UTC  

I think the pharmaceutical industry would jump at the opportunity to charge men for something on the long-term like birth control, honestly

2019-01-30 04:35:54 UTC  

Oh, that's good if I'm misremembering. I remembered it being a pain

2019-01-30 04:36:14 UTC  

And there were also underwear that would help but I don't remember the detail of those either

2019-01-30 04:37:32 UTC  

There is a leaf the Malaysian government was studying for male BC. It is available now as an "herbal suppliment".

2019-01-30 04:38:25 UTC  

Next time I am in Malaysia I'll procure seeds. 😇

2019-01-30 04:38:32 UTC  

"Suspensories" is the underwear. I kept thinking "suspenders"

2019-01-30 04:38:42 UTC  

Nice!

2019-01-30 04:39:22 UTC  

Eh honestly I want something studied and approved by the FDA, I'm not super willing to risk 18 years of financial responsibility on what amounts to a home remedy

2019-01-30 04:39:30 UTC  

Here is some info on the different methods, although very basic https://www.livescience.com/54105-which-male-birth-control-works.html

2019-01-30 04:39:41 UTC  

Yeah, I hear you

2019-01-30 04:40:17 UTC  

I trust good science more than the FDA. The government is swayed by politics. Science is science.

2019-01-30 04:40:56 UTC  

Wouldn't the government jump at the chance to reduce accidental children and thus state dependence?

2019-01-30 04:41:15 UTC  

I trust science too, but there haven't been that many studies done on these methods, although they seem to work if you're doing them consistently

2019-01-30 04:43:00 UTC  

I do not think the government jumps on anything because it is good. They do it because the politicians decided it is in their personal best interest.

2019-01-30 04:44:22 UTC  

Otherwise, explain to me why it is illegal to cut hair without a license in some states.

2019-01-30 04:44:34 UTC  

Well, I understand being ginger about methods that seem too "home-remedy-ey"

2019-01-30 04:44:49 UTC  

Are you serious? What states?