Message from @InsaneCaterpilla

Discord ID: 550063253502558241


2019-02-26 17:36:01 UTC  

Not to say we shouldn't discuss it more

2019-02-26 18:01:10 UTC  

I've debated the issue before

2019-02-26 21:01:12 UTC  

@Suzaku Kururugi Gender quotas are "affirmative action". They are supposed to be balancing out a gender bias in the first place. They may have even done so during the first year or two of being in place. They aren't really my idea of equality but because they are something that supposedly is an equality thing, arguing against them before they get super rediculous is difficult. And it is only relatively recently that affirmative action in colleges became affirmative action for the majority.

2019-02-26 21:01:31 UTC  

As much as I am an antifeminist, there are worse things feminism has put in place in the name of gender equality

2019-02-26 21:01:47 UTC  

Things that are less disputably for equality, like mother preference in custody battles or anything domestic violence related

2019-02-26 21:03:14 UTC  

..

2019-02-26 21:03:25 UTC  

That said, we do discuss it a fair bit. I think characterizing it as "barely discussed" is unfair.

2019-02-26 21:06:03 UTC  

Nonetheless, I would say that university admission quotas is a rather minor issue indeed, and employment discrimination though serious is newer and I lack detailed statistics on it.

2019-02-26 21:08:59 UTC  

They're both one in the same. Both are used to keep men out of jobs and work, which they can otherwise get through merit

2019-02-26 21:09:05 UTC  

Not really

2019-02-26 21:09:16 UTC  

University attendance is something rediculous in Canada like 50%

2019-02-26 21:09:28 UTC  

gender quotas aren't really keeping men out of jobs up here

2019-02-26 21:09:47 UTC  

well, not on the university side

2019-02-26 21:09:59 UTC  

The employment discrimination is especially galling over here

2019-02-26 21:10:02 UTC  

Have you ever considered that the reason for that is that more men choose to work and women take 'time off'?

2019-02-26 21:11:31 UTC  

Yeah, that is an example of female privilege, not having to care as much about wealth to have a good life

2019-02-26 21:12:00 UTC  

But issues that are merely female privilege are right now kinda the lowest of the lesser issues

2019-02-26 21:12:52 UTC  

The point is that enough people get into university that it really doesn't impact lifetime employment opportunities that much

2019-02-26 21:14:15 UTC  

I imagine it prevents men (or boys) participating in the education they otherwise deserve to get gainful employment *in the fields they deserve*

2019-02-26 21:14:36 UTC  

It doesn't though. If you get a 1.8 gpa you're not getting employment from your degree

2019-02-26 21:14:59 UTC  

Gpa means nothing to me, I'm British

2019-02-26 21:15:21 UTC  

Oh. If you pass university with something like 60%, no company is going to hire you based on your degree

2019-02-26 21:17:18 UTC  

The british situation might be significant depending on how many go to university over there, but in Canada (esp.), and also the US, getting into the university system is far easier than it is useful. So women being able to get in easier...meh

2019-02-26 21:18:10 UTC  

Important programs like prestigious medical stuff doesn't have affirmative action for women, because they tried it for a brief period and realized that they were causing an experienced doctor's shortage due to women not working as much as men

2019-02-26 21:18:45 UTC  

where did you get this information

2019-02-26 21:19:01 UTC  

I ask because I work in a medical field and this is still a major problem

2019-02-26 21:19:27 UTC  

Are you counting the overwhelming amount of scholorships which are woman only in your consideration of how much the education system is biased?

2019-02-26 21:19:40 UTC  

It's not easy if you can't afford it

2019-02-26 21:21:08 UTC  

Oh wow, that was actually a japanese source: “Women often quit their jobs due to marriage and childbirth after graduating from the university,” the source told the Yomiuri Shimbun. “There is a strong feeling within the university that male doctors support the medical services at its hospitals.”

“There was a silent understanding [to accept more male students] as one way to resolve the doctor shortage,” the source told the Yomiuri Shimbun, according to the Washington Post. The policy was a “necessary evil,” the source said.

2019-02-26 21:21:15 UTC  

Not at all what I remembered it as

2019-02-26 21:21:37 UTC  

So I'm actually talking out of my ass on that one

2019-02-26 21:21:48 UTC  

That is no longer continuing

2019-02-26 21:22:18 UTC  

"Are you counting the overwhelming amount of scholorships which are woman only in your consideration of how much the education system is biased?" -- ABSOLUTELY NOT. That is a real issue

2019-02-26 21:22:37 UTC  

I was hoping you were right, but underqualified females in entry level medical positions is a very serious problem

2019-02-26 21:22:44 UTC  

that I deal with on a daily basis

2019-02-26 21:22:54 UTC  

But entry level medical positions means nurses right?

2019-02-26 21:23:04 UTC  

You're not talking doctors/surgeons?

2019-02-26 21:23:09 UTC  

in my particular job position it means Lab Assistants

2019-02-26 21:23:14 UTC  

Ah

2019-02-26 21:24:02 UTC  

they show up for work after receiving the position with almost no understanding of the rules and regulations of working in a Lab Environment and I have to spend months training them before I can even allow them to do their job