@FreshWholeMilk are you aware i mentioned exactly that?

thats literally a huge part of my point, it just when science is involved and i ask a scientific question, im not looking for a "who" but a "how". its like asking how a car is built and you tell me factory workers.

People who dismiss science and replace it with science are fools

You can have both you mongoloids

wat

so we can have 2 science ???

@Holly Jolly Willow i think you mean replace god with science but this seems to be the line scipio is taking

When society reaches the inevitable arrival of transhumanism there will come a time of nihilism in the sense that the values provided by God will no longer be enough to accomodate for post-human human existence

Nietzche delved into this topic extensively and its worth it to have a look at his concepts of "God is dead" and the "ubermensch"

human beings that eventually reach lifespans of 500+ years will eventually have to start looking towards themselves to create their own values where God fails to provide, as the lack of "death" will eventually make it easier for humans to fall into degeneracy

No I mean replace science with holy unknowns for no reason

Why not just admit that science is real and just say "oh yeah my God is cool because they made all this intricate math and science."

This looks like a strawman made out of misunderstandings or experiences with low iq people. Anyway, you shouldn't argue here. You can move this to <#507035890640486411> or <#508381442942959616>

This is a religious chat we're on topic

B I T c h

@Orwell material well-being is far from why people need God

its proper co-existence of society itself

@Holly Jolly Willow Keep insulting the admin

@Bearer Of The Curse bb ii TT cc hh

It's a meme obviously, don't take everything to heart

I like double letters. I won't punish you, you just should be aware and not act aggressively

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9k4cRRHv1w

this redpilled me

"fun" was just recently invented, 19th century russian wouldnt understand the world

fun is empty brain game

its has no content except self-worship

worship of ones own desires

i think this is bit to extreme tough

as orthodox monks

are known for their radicalism, casue again - they are monks

That's not what he said, he just pointed out that fun being the higher objective is alien and unholy, and that there is a cult of entertainment nowadays, which are both correct.

yeah, great that you pointed that out

Abolishing fun to own the libs

this is to much of redpill to Kazimir

go eat your bluepills

(((fun)))

What are you talking about m8 @Milan

You gave <:autism:508484030165942293> rating to the Bearer of the Course. Is it to mock my misunderstanding or cause you disagree?

It's just to mock me, he has nothing better to do

From oxford dictionaries “fun” arises from the late 17th century and unless the translations I’ve been reading are terrible, “fun” is used in war and peace pretty extensively. Also I have no idea why people divorce long term achievement and fun. Accomplishing your goals is enjoyable, progress towards that same. I don’t get this self-flagellation that people put themselves through thinking they either have to be dour, spiritually pure aescetics who hate all fun or obese drunks slamming hookers and injecting meth into their eye. You can be happy and be a good person.

@Milan Ah, no. That's just to mock Bearing over here. Your points are more than valid and, as an Orthodox myself, "fun" in no way can be strived towards as a higher goal.