if you use violence, he lives

If you kill your enemies, they win.

i would use some, but not all violence.

there has to be a limit somewhere.

atleast communists realize what a greater good is holy shit

Do governments have limits on violence, in your opinion?

So killing yourself is a violation of the NAP...*huh*

suicide is also technically illegal

What are they going to do execute you?

Kek

water would rather let his friend kill himself and go to Hell

Suicide is punishable by death in ancap society.

rather than saving him via violence

via significant violence, but if necessary i would use appropriate force.

But isn't your body just your property?

i won’t remove his legs to stop him from jumping off a bridge.

@Water signifigant violence against friend which saves him, or let friend die and go to hell

if they’re absolutely going to kill themselves no matter what, eventually what you do to prevent it would rob them of what life they still have.

if appropriate force would stop them, i would do so.

water holy shit

i said saves for a reason

theres 2 options here

but there comes a point where it’s inappropriate.

signifigant violence

or friend condeming himself to hell

circumstances vary too much to make an absolute choice

SIGNIFIGANT VIOLENCE

OR FRIEND CONDEMING HIMSELF TO HELL

does significant violence mean tackling him, or blowing his legs off?

water, I thought you said pushing wanst signifigant violence

significant violence is broad, and varies on a situational basis.

ok, lets say

if you tackle someone you can do a hell of a lot more than a shove.

you have to shoot him in the leg with a mosin nagant

to save him

he wont die from the wound

if i’m certain he’ll live, sure i’d do that.

but if saving his life means threatening it further, no.

well, wouldnt him dying from the wound mean he would go to heaven

that’s not for me to decide.

at that point, what happens to him is between him and God.