so water will let his friend die

only if seriously harming them is the only way to stop them.

because his dopamine worship wont allow him to save a life

It's their right to not use their right to live though.

i won’t blow his leg off to stop him from hanging himself.

you don’t give yourself rights, rights are not a community.

commodity reeee*

so water's only opposition to his best friend killing himself...is that suicide is a violation of rights

doesnt care that its his best friend fucking dying

noooo its MUH RIGHTS

if he kills himself, he dies. that’s my objection.

I would not wish to be your friend *and* have depression, Water.

if you use violence, he lives

If you kill your enemies, they win.

i would use some, but not all violence.

there has to be a limit somewhere.

atleast communists realize what a greater good is holy shit

Do governments have limits on violence, in your opinion?

So killing yourself is a violation of the NAP...*huh*

suicide is also technically illegal

What are they going to do execute you?

Kek

water would rather let his friend kill himself and go to Hell

Suicide is punishable by death in ancap society.

rather than saving him via violence

via significant violence, but if necessary i would use appropriate force.

But isn't your body just your property?

i won’t remove his legs to stop him from jumping off a bridge.

@Water signifigant violence against friend which saves him, or let friend die and go to hell

if they’re absolutely going to kill themselves no matter what, eventually what you do to prevent it would rob them of what life they still have.

if appropriate force would stop them, i would do so.

water holy shit

i said saves for a reason

theres 2 options here

but there comes a point where it’s inappropriate.

signifigant violence

or friend condeming himself to hell

circumstances vary too much to make an absolute choice

SIGNIFIGANT VIOLENCE

OR FRIEND CONDEMING HIMSELF TO HELL

does significant violence mean tackling him, or blowing his legs off?