Message from @CronoSaturn

Discord ID: 539534605825605652


2019-01-28 11:46:46 UTC  

"race is not a largely impactful factor as the growth of asia has shown in accounting for a nations success and is a pretty poor predictive factor in isolation of outcomes
"

2019-01-28 11:46:53 UTC  

What are you even saying?

2019-01-28 11:47:46 UTC  

Also genetic specialization is objectively stronger for trait expression than genetic diversity and the dulling of trait expression

2019-01-28 11:48:04 UTC  

You're*

2019-01-28 11:49:15 UTC  

these neegros are a snapshot of all the factors that went into their race

2019-01-28 11:49:29 UTC  

and you cant change the snapshot

2019-01-28 11:49:38 UTC  

without spending alot of resources and time

2019-01-28 11:49:47 UTC  

that would take away from our own welbeing

2019-01-28 11:49:54 UTC  

as white nations

2019-01-28 11:50:13 UTC  

they are frozen in time

2019-01-28 11:50:25 UTC  

just like we are

2019-01-28 11:51:29 UTC  

Your genetic traits, so long as they are selected for, will be passed on forever

2019-01-28 11:51:36 UTC  

They don't go away

2019-01-28 11:52:31 UTC  

historically asians were seen as an inferior and less developed race and the growth of japan, china and korea dispell this notion pretty handily.
race in isolation of other factors is not useful in predicting outcomes as other factors, class, education, upbringing, nutrition, etc are more useful in predicting those outcomes.
genetic diversity is the collection of a number of specialties across a population. Your genes are not effected by who enters or leaves society and visa versa. If you fuck and produce kids then clearly whatever you and your partner have were good enough so you have more of that and on it goes.

2019-01-28 11:54:06 UTC  

and where is this frozen in time bullshit? we're chatting away on discord, some of us on iPhones. I didnt have these growing up

2019-01-28 12:02:03 UTC  

my genetic traits are often the result of blocks of snps which is not how genes are passed on, being an almost random scramble of 50% of my and 50% of the mother's dna. as such theres plenty of traits that will not be shared between me and my offspring. As dominant and recessive traits are also a thing it is fully possible that the child may present traits inherited from me that I don't exhibit.

2019-01-28 12:02:54 UTC  

for example the chances are low that if i have kids they'll agree with me that cilantro tastes like soap

2019-01-28 13:26:40 UTC  

being gay is mental health disorder. The mental health departments must take care of it. There is nothing to be proud of having a retarded mental health, except of the success they achieve in their ignorance!

2019-01-28 19:35:15 UTC  

Mental health “treatment” of homosexuality is ineffective and, as shown by Alan Turing, impacts the the ability for otherwise highly functional members of society to contribute. Such action is counter productive and so our efforts should be directed elsewhere

I leave this here

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/508381442942959616/539531791640297513/image0.jpg

2019-01-28 19:57:54 UTC  

That’s gross but whether that remains true in the wake of CRISPR remains to be seen. In any case, the efficacy of the current policy is high with lower suicide rates, more active participation and lower anti-social activity (drug use etc). It’s not for me, but I’ve no intent of paying the cost to prevent others.

2019-01-29 06:39:05 UTC  

CRISPr wouldn't be able to change your sex after birth though?

2019-01-29 06:46:08 UTC  

nope

2019-01-29 06:46:27 UTC  

crispr works by changing small parts of small sections of DNA in single cells

2019-01-29 06:46:45 UTC  

even if you could use crispr on that scale

2019-01-29 06:46:51 UTC  

you'd still be a male

2019-01-29 06:47:11 UTC  

you cant change fundamental organs and hormone producers that late on via crispr

2019-01-29 06:47:27 UTC  

crispr could be used to change a baby's gender while it's still a single cell though

2019-01-29 07:03:24 UTC  

People also like to forget that trait expression occurs through the interaction between all of the genes

2019-01-29 07:04:24 UTC  

The process of switching your genitals (with genetic surgery) would likely mutate you in all sorts of unpredictable ways

2019-01-29 07:04:33 UTC  

Talk about fun

2019-01-29 08:39:21 UTC  

While *conventionally* crispr works on sections of 5-62 snps in length research has been produced that modifications on the chromosome level can be achieved using more sophisticated systems based off crispr (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701507/)

2019-01-29 08:41:57 UTC  

Gene therapy on living, non-foetal humans is a thing and while its not crispr and doesnt alter the germline, the fda have already approved some therapies (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fda-approves-first-gene-therapy-targeting-rare-form-of-inherited-blindness/)

2019-01-29 09:11:49 UTC  

Individual traits do not require an interaction with the entire genome and protein sequences can and do express the same traits even when transplanted across species. (https://www.theverge.com/2013/12/30/5256732/scientists-create-glow-in-the-dark-pigs-using-jellyfish-dna)

2019-01-29 09:22:17 UTC  

So end of the day, while the technology is very immature there is substantial reason to believe that fully functional, biological gender swaps could be accomplished as the technology matures. Reports are conflicting, and china is always a dubious source, but tests seem to have been conducted despite ethical concerns on adults (https://qz.com/1185488/chinese-scientists-used-crispr-gene-editing-on-86-human-patients/) and more controversially, on the germline of kids apparently (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-11-27/china-gene-edited-babies/10556676)

2019-01-31 16:57:49 UTC  

Either way, I don't know everything so I could very well be wrong. Thanks for talking to me about this, I've gotta go though. I'll talk to you all later.

2019-01-31 17:48:58 UTC  

second round

2019-02-01 20:52:01 UTC  

government structure idea: an unequal bicameral system, main body: senate: half by popular election from the various counties/states/States; the other half is elected via government (perhaps pre-17th Amendment style idk). all bureaucracy is under the senate, and the senate can delegate its power (not 100% sure on this part tbh). then all laws or regulations must then pass through a vote of what is essentially a Representative democracy in the most primitive sense. i want a large body with middle/working class people being a check on the government. all laws require 50% majority to become law from this body. in addition, this Rep Dem body can draw proposals to give to the senate, if 2/3 majority is achieved, its mandatory that the senate do something.