You mean the same Poland that allowed 100,000 Filipinos to come as "guest workers"

poles are no longer based communist chinese are my new friends now

You mean the same China that always buys American technology from Israel
The one that is trying to ethincally wipe out the Tibetans, Ughyers, and (potentially) other Asiatics

wipe out others and keep your own people in poverty so that you don't get wiped out or get migrant workers

You forgot inner mongolia

Yea i know
But you get the idea

Still though if this keeps up there will be a Sino-Mutt in the near future
Seeing as how the Han Chinese like to wipe out other ethnic groups either through *"assimilation"* or just straight up genociding them and everything in between

uyghurs

i am 25% uyghur

https://twitter.com/SHUFFY_YT/status/1092502458302124032?s=19

I wonder why people arent using shit like Riot

thats what I thought

Im going to set one up tomorrow

Discord is highly accessible

that counts for a lot with casual users

@PunishedMuskovy basically we either use the most popular (invariably botnet) service or use an extremely obscure service that only autistic linux users will find

Like for the purposes of some arch linux help group I'm sure IRC isn't that bad

but for political stuff we need to include dumb people and hence maybe discord is a better choice despite my autism

Dems are trying to push this bullshit now btw

The unwilling part is pretty bad cuz that can essentially be everyone

America really needs another silver legion or american blackshirts

Not this nazi bs

it be better

for everyone to work 4h a day, some random administrative job(ie that requires only physical strain, and is monotone and etc..), from age of 10 till death

https://youtu.be/6vO-XDUiRqU?t=80

Thank you very much for posting this movie clip in the serious discussions channel.

4 hour work day is feasible but only for a minority of freelancers

why is RT labeled on websites like youtube as "being funded by Russian Government", yet the BBC is a "public broadcast" despite the fact that it receives money from the Government?

because biased technocrats are biased

thats what i figured

youtube algos are just shit too

but leaving that out is purely because they chose not to assign a value to BBC not due to being incompetent

oh britain, the incompetent totalitarians

exactly, they have yet to really become ingsoc. then they become *competent* totalitarians. and shit gets wack.

RT is russian propaganda - and i love it cause of it. It propagates Russian Point of View, thats what they themselves say. I dont get it when people are angry about this

Long live Mother Russia!

Because rt is considered by the russian govt as a strategic asset (https://web.archive.org/web/20081227071316/http://www.government.ru/content/governmentactivity/mainnews/33281de212bf49fdbf39d611cadbae95.doc). Margarita simonyan, the editor in chief has stated in interviews repeatedly that she sees the organisation as being parallel to defence (http://archive.is/RzLyk). The bbc has a huge framework of transparency and has shown that its fully willing to critique the british govt. RT does not demonstrate that and would, as current events seem to show, (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-usa-media-restrictions-rt/russias-rt-america-registers-as-foreign-agent-in-u-s-idUSKBN1DD25B) prefer to register as a foriegn agent then apply a minimum standard of transparency.

BBC only criticizes the British government when it’s against what they want people to think

the bbc's adherence to an orthodox perspective of its own delineation is a separate conversation. Happy to have it but to even recognize that statement we have to first accept that the BBC and the government of the United Kingdom form their conception independently of one another. RT seems to take pride in being a mouthpiece for the kremlin and so to answer @Scipio Americanus original question, we say the bbc is a public broadcast because it's an independent organization which receives money from the public, whereas RT is held to a higher level of scrutiny as it seems to see itself as an extension of the russian state with, if similar projects are anything to go by, russian ministry members acting as tie-ins to executive roles

Also moving the discussion here as it seems more fitting but finally replying to something in normal chat earlier in the week...

@Aki
```significant intermarriage... is irrelevant to your original point```
I disagree. It shows that genetic differences between ‘whites’ and ‘jews’ are inconsistent and seemingly arbitrary. While not conclusive, in the absence of a set range of genome sequences which we are to call ‘jewish’ it shows strong reason to doubt why we would suspect ashkenazi jews higher earning rates as explainable by a genetic advantage where we would not expect the same of a highly similar group, ie mainland Europeans. In order to prove your assertion a specific gene set would need to be found and you would need to show that this gene set is characteristic of the ‘jewish’ range of genomes. As our conversation seems to be scoped around the US we would also need to collect earnings data based on genome, rather than self-identity, as the US currently collects racial data.

```IQ disparity... is not a sufficient explanation```
That is not my position. IQ disparity *would* be a sufficient explanation but it is not a *neccesary* cause of wealth disparity as I illustrated with the Paris Hilton example.