the bible's over 2000 years old

If you don’t have free will, then you aren’t actually making any of these arguments, your arguments are just a product of random chemical processes. So I win the debate. Thank you

and has been translated several dozen times

Nobody said they were random

I dont even see how that follows

run the communist manifesto through google translate a few times

@FreshWholeMilk that would apply to all of us. so the correct answer is that nobody wins in the subjective sense.

Still not your choice to make the arguments

see if it makes any sense

The bible is big-brainy and you should take god as an egoistic god just to make the direct dialogues viable

bible is for big headed people

okay, what?

<:iq:521476887223074827>

No one chooses to believe anything

Bible makes very little sense indeed. And, say what you say of science, but its findings make a whole lot more sense.

i don't have faith in algebra

His much of the bible have you read?

i like the old testament the most

everything else is kinda like a spinoff

I like the part where god couldn’t beat the canaanites because they had iron chariots

So you're a jew?

oh shit i forgot

the old testement is like jewish isn't it

i'm a agonist if that makes anything better

The whole thing is Jewish

The Old Testament makes no sense without the New Testament. You need the New Testament to decode all the symbolism

And by Jewish we mean ethnicity

First off, you didn't clarify what you meant by free will. You asked, if it existed, which is going to depend on how that person defines free will.

I would say free will doesn't exist, and what I mean by that is, we are inclined and influenced to make certain decisions, and for the most part they can be resisted.

And by the way, this is something you agree with, too. Black people are more criminal than whites for genetic reasons, because they are inclined to be. @FreshWholeMilk

Hey now, I didn’t ask for your life story

You asked an open ended question, and then reduced the response to your personal interpretation

that's not a good way to go about it

tl;dr black people don't have free will

^^^^

Did you mean agorist?

agonist

as in agonistic

agnostic?

He’s not sure

am i having a stroke again

Sure, different groups of people have different inclinations towards certain behaviour, but they still have the choice whether or not to behave in that way

can you substantiate that claim though?