I don't remember deflecting. I've explained my position on absolute morality in the past

not in that particular conversation

it was never really directly challenged, but anyway

And I remember getting the role Fedora Desroyer and your word of defeat <:30yoboomer:521380551316209668>

I made that role

anyway

I've always said we define objective morality subjectively

we do

every two group of people think their system of objective morality is the right one

even I think mine is

this

But I realize at a conscious level it really isn't, because people have different perspectives and hold different accounts of the truth

Truth may be objective

But us being humans

we are limited in our understanding of it

so it's not that I think

context

changes morality

"changes"

determines

is what I meant to say

its not that there is objective morality or strictly subjective one, but its more that there exists a relativistic morality, which does have objective basis (in the body, its genes, its memory, etc) from which it arises, but that its relative from body to body. so its in a sense both objective and subjective at the same time.

If you think that your system of beliefs is wrong you're a cuck

It's knowledge that determines morality

in my opinion

Also, there isn't anything "nihilistic" about my belief system. I have never once argued that life was meaningless. I have argued that biology itself will force you to have a meaning, and anyone who does not embrace it will usually not survive or reproduce

well, knowledge does greatly influence it, but the appropriate neurobiology being absent, knowledge will not yield us morality

so its not the primary item

its a major factor though

Why not?

it's defined by what is best for the group, is it not?

Intelligence and Wisdom are two different attributes <:30yoboomer:521380551316209668>

Doesn't really contradict what I said, I was combining them into one

anyway

the way I would say it

biology gives us a foundation of morality, we build on top of it with what we know or what we perceive to be the truth

well yes

I can agree with that latest summation

biology serves as the necessary foundation, but from there information complexity begins to take the leading role

I spot a double space. <:ree:520000441036046336>