While huge territory

Your vote has no impact because you live in a bourgois democracy

Hey captains

it is undermined at every turn

being relatively poor isn't always a negative

the only way to achieve true power or meaning for your vote is socialism

having more material wealth isn't always positive

Socialism has bourgeois too

The socialist party

That rules the state

No, my vote has no impact because I'm one person and there are tens of thousands of voters

which, of course, expands democracy and the power of the electorate into a system that runs through society in a multi-tiered fashion

One voter is worthless

Democracy empowers the masses against individuals

one voter in a worker-cooperative is a crucial element, or, indeed, in the commune

The masses want liberalism, feminism, and demographic replacement so the rest of us must live with it.

And fascism empowers the state against the masses, capitalism empowers the capitalist against the workers, etc. Its not like the other alternatives are that much better. True liberty and sovereignty can only be realised in the working masses which exercise their sovereign power via the workers' councils.

@Xinyue is there a Nation in your system?

Democracy is just a tool for enacting policy. Nothing more

Nations do exist, yes, but they are realised as autonomous republics within a greater international federation. They could have their own laws, national guards, parliaments, etc. As we see with many federations today @AdorableStormtrooper

Don't fuck with me

I've got the power of God AND anime on my side

You've lost sight of what matters. What matters is not feeling like you have a voice or that you're equal or that everyone is a team. What matters is the survival and prosperity of you and your kind.

@Xinyue So there are National Elections not just Coop elections then... Snakes point holds then on Democracy

If democracy results in worse policies, it's bad.

Democratic power in and of itself is not valuble

yes, the results actually do matter, not just the philosophy sounding good in the abstract

Yes, there would be national elections, elections in coops, elections in coop federations, etc. All voluntary of course. It would be a multi-tiered democratic system, and one could choose work at a level that they think is most meaningful for them. I think coop elections would become most popular personally.

Voluntary? Give me a break. None of this is voluntary

Voting would be voluntary

You're not allowed to own private property

not sure why you posit this is not so

Yes, you wouldn't be allowed to own private property. But this has no bearing on voting

is syndicalism a heresy to you

odd point

I cant sell another guy who wants something and is willing to pay me what he wants

And there would be social property so its not like property ceases to exist

WHAT IF compulsory voting was put into place

what is thats gay

Boom

compulsory voting is gay