Making sure they don't actually have any communication in the meantime of course

If you have 2+ people you can always say whoever talks will be spared

And they'll worry that the others talked

If they think the other talked

They'll think they've nothing to lose

They want to be spared though

If they refuse to talk and their buddy does, their buddy is spared while they get shafted

This depends on circumstance, if they think talking might get them killed fir example

Yeah there's a lot of factors

They might still refuse to talk

Mind reading would make this easier

This Notso guy has a strange morality, I'd like to know where it comes from, what's the justificative for it.

I've heard of polygraphs being used not because they work but because the prisoner might think they do

I agree with most of his ideas. There should be right to a trial if you're actually of a crime, presumption of innocence, it would be very difficult to ban a religion even in private so that's probably foolish, a warrant should be obtained in order to search private property, etc.

Does it not work to a certain extent?

Not if you know how to beat them

Same with drugs, Snake.

Drugs?

"it would be very difficult to ban a religion even in private so that's probably foolish"

Drugs are physical objects. You can make it illegal to produce, sell, or use the objects

What matters is taking it away from the culture and normal sphere

It's hard to ban praying to X diety

Or ban beliefs

The polygraph is not very reliable, so it's not usually used as evidence

But it is used for the psychological effect

It's harder to find proof, just that. If you find a religion that's directly problematic to the state and its people, you should smash it with overwhelming force

Yes

I believe in not outlawing Islam in this hypothetical kaiserreich but outlawing burkas hijabs etc. and possibly mosques

Yes banning mosques is far easier than banning Islam. There are also ways to reduce the amount of Islam indirectly like no more Muslim Immigration. You interview immigrant applications and screen out Muslims. They could lie and slip through, but you'll eliminate 99% of them

Broke: outlaw hijab
Woke: ban public indecency

Yes

That's what you want...to prevent accommodation of foreign religions in any way, and promote religions of your people

Not that you HAVE to be a Christian, calm your anuses Atheists, but if there is religion, it's a European one.

"Unbiased, Open Research [on Homosexuality] Was Never Done"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPgq1c4TYi4

Bigot!

Mosques represent the dominion and authority of Islam. They must be banned

Anywhere there is a mosque it is considered Islamic territory

@RealBullWhip banning public indecency would be very Christian

Should already be banned though?

I mean immodest attire and thot behavior

Force people to cover up and be civilized in public