Message from @Rex Carthaginis
Discord ID: 522811198522130433
There are techniques to interrogstion that have been shown to be effective
But straight torture isn't one
I suppose if you lie, they would have to investigate to find out whether you lied or not, so inevitably they'd take a break
Which reinforces that lying works
A common one if you arrest two is to lie and say the other one squealed
Making sure they don't actually have any communication in the meantime of course
If you have 2+ people you can always say whoever talks will be spared
And they'll worry that the others talked
If they think the other talked
They'll think they've nothing to lose
They want to be spared though
If they refuse to talk and their buddy does, their buddy is spared while they get shafted
This depends on circumstance, if they think talking might get them killed fir example
Yeah there's a lot of factors
They might still refuse to talk
Mind reading would make this easier
This Notso guy has a strange morality, I'd like to know where it comes from, what's the justificative for it.
I've heard of polygraphs being used not because they work but because the prisoner might think they do
I agree with most of his ideas. There should be right to a trial if you're actually of a crime, presumption of innocence, it would be very difficult to ban a religion even in private so that's probably foolish, a warrant should be obtained in order to search private property, etc.
Does it not work to a certain extent?
Same with drugs, Snake.
Drugs?
"it would be very difficult to ban a religion even in private so that's probably foolish"
Drugs are physical objects. You can make it illegal to produce, sell, or use the objects
What matters is taking it away from the culture and normal sphere
It's hard to ban praying to X diety
Or ban beliefs
The polygraph is not very reliable, so it's not usually used as evidence
But it is used for the psychological effect
It's harder to find proof, just that. If you find a religion that's directly problematic to the state and its people, you should smash it with overwhelming force
Yes
I believe in not outlawing Islam in this hypothetical kaiserreich but outlawing burkas hijabs etc. and possibly mosques
Yes banning mosques is far easier than banning Islam. There are also ways to reduce the amount of Islam indirectly like no more Muslim Immigration. You interview immigrant applications and screen out Muslims. They could lie and slip through, but you'll eliminate 99% of them
Broke: outlaw hijab
Woke: ban public indecency
Yes
That's what you want...to prevent accommodation of foreign religions in any way, and promote religions of your people
Not that you HAVE to be a Christian, calm your anuses Atheists, but if there is religion, it's a European one.
"Unbiased, Open Research [on Homosexuality] Was Never Done"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPgq1c4TYi4
Bigot!
Mosques represent the dominion and authority of Islam. They must be banned