"muh incentives"

You define words in ways that benefit your ideology.. which is great i guess..

selfishness for the material

uh, no

materialism is actually something that has existed for hundreds of years

its not materialist but it is very hedonistic and bland

its a school of thought in philosophy

the maximum profits and pleasures for porky plz

currency=potential things

and itself it makes no claim on hedonism being good or something, its just a statement on what existences are primary and what are emergent, etc.

im saying capitalism is very hedonistic incase you were wondering not materialism

in fact Marxists were often anti-hedonists, and urged the importance of socialist and communist virtue, and made *materialist arguments for this*

ffs

Evola was a tool

here's the thing with xinu, "look at the plans, the literature, the theory, stop looking at the Result IRL, that's not real/proper/enough of [insert ideology]

@Xinyue i was commenting on capitalism not marxism, marxism is typically against hedonism but then again intersectionality and leftist idpol exists

I'm not hearing a rebutal

can't wait for that epic queer anarchist revolution

@Xinyue <:brainlet:508484031625691156>

Queer Nationalism when?

capitalism is materialistic

^

as an Ideological Goal it is

that Evola quote for example absolutely disregards that Marxism is *not* merely about just "muh distribution, muh goods", there's a content of meaning to it and reasoning for what is essential to human beings, why we exist and what we ought to strive towards

but trust people who never read Marx and Engels to be oblivious to this

lmao

but it sprouted due to inequality of the material wealth

it's an ideology

we get it

the entirety of marxist philosophy is based on economics

it's a lifestyle

and economic relationships

like Libertarianism

"y-you've just never read kapital!"

Yes, the philosophy posits that men are shaped by their environment, which is readily observable, and will therefore react to the environment - specifically the relationship between men's objective needs and objects of those needs. But this is merely one part of Marxism, the explanation for why the world is as it is, why history develops as it does, and what can be expected from the future. The entire discourse on labour and its significance to man is outside this analysis.

You're ignoring the other half of the Equation with the statement about Environment and People

go on?

most of us ignore the soul of the person as well

People are not a blank slate, different groups of people will react to different environments in different ways such that they're predictible

@Bird Wizard marxists think feels don't reals