I've said time and time again that the Soviets killed 600K-700K people who *cannot be justified as kills*

irrelevant

and that this was the great moral failure of the Soviet Union

however,

the killing of the Kulaks came *after* their obstructionism

not before

Soviet Created Famines were also an Atrocity

to which you admit so called Kulaks played a minor role

Kulaks played the major moral role, considering their sabotage was intentional

and can be confirmed to be such

```the killing of the Kulaks came after their obstructionism```


yes, there are always reasons as i said with Nazi and Poland comparison, Soviets made things worse by going ahead with the thing they were protesting

and further, Soviet administration was the one that *ended* the chronic famines in the regions controlled by Soviets that had been a **feature** not a **flaw** in the previous system

```Kulaks played the major moral role, considering their sabotage was intentional```

make up your mind mate @Xinyue

I have said that the kulaks played the major moral role in the famine from the beginning

never once did I flinch in this

@Stern No no no... not so easy. Lets start first with which countries participated in the golden blocade. A link to the source plox... sencond we will go to why it had to paid in grain. (Just as a side not "Without industrialized transportation and production systems, famine is more likely to occur" this "is more likely to occur is already moving the goalpost)

Soviet Policy began it, yes, because it set the Kulak Reaction in motion, however this was not moral matter because it was not intentional on the part of the Soviets

first of all, it wasn't sabotage by "Kulaks", for someone so intent on defending the pure intentions of the Soviet State, u sure don't care about the intentions of people you Dehumanize @Xinyue

They were protesting after making petitions after petitions

No Farmer ever Burns their own produce for no reason, and i know you think Soviet Policy was for greater good, but the results after the slaughter of "Kulaks" describe a different story @Xinyue

kulaks are basically white farmers in SA

yeah, they called small time farmers Bourgeoisie and these people still do as though they were owners of some multi million dollar concentrated Monopoly

I don't think that the farmers in africa did anything

these were multiple small time Farmers these people killed and then wondered why there's a fall in produce, pretty much the story in Zimbabwe

and it's the same dehumanization

@AdorableStormtrooper I do get that they were making petitions, but this is immaterial because in the end they decided to fuck over everybody in their country rather than hand over the farms to collective ownership and then share in the benefits. I never said they did it for no reason, its very clear they did it out of spite.

that's basically u suciding ur economy if u want collective ownership

just share the benefits mayyyn

look at the people that actually want communism in SA

>when you have a famine but continue exporting grain

It was the Soviets who decided to fuck everyone over with their economic policy mate, not little maa and paw farms on the country side 😂 @Xinyue

collective ownership worked just fine during the USSR post Stalin, absolutely no famines of any kind

it's the same thuggish mentality that stalin had, just take it by force

@Stern Then you would have to prove that industralization couldn't wait for a year or two.

ussr collapsed post stalin

Sovkhoz and Kolkhoz did provide foodstuffs just fine

@Xinyue absolutely no food shortages amiright?

zero famines, yes

@Aki ?

Well will you adress it or not?

no food shortages, ever after the holodomor? right? @Xinyue