Message from @Just a weirdo
Discord ID: 527733925020172297
you will still have a certain level of diversity, because people self segregate
The minorities will self segregate, and eventually disappear
I mean to just ignore for a moment the high-level intelligence research associated with AI development and consciousness research, just look at some low-level research that will yield us many benefits - research on why green tea and other herbs like it improve memory, combat alzheimer's, why they have the ability to improve neurochemical processes associated with intelligence, etc. etc. There's so much research being conducted on all levels that to think that this won't yield us benefits like the ones that futurists are predicting (on the basis of research such as this) is strange to me.
Unless there is milf
you're looking at a very very very long time frame
Arent you also ?
you're looking at half a millennia or something when all diversity disappears and everything levels out
that's at the very least
probably longer
I mean I'm not talking about people becoming one blob, I'm talking about nations merging
Do you consider our world diverse ?
those are two different things
the world is diverse, yes
@Xinyue xYou would have a dude with 3 doctor degrees cleaning the streets
see xin, i agree with you for all the wrong reasons lol
africa will be a blob, middle east will be a blob, asia will be a blob, europe and russia
but not mixing per se
There's no reason to segregate around the racial lines
none
once the things that have been discussed here come to pass,
the one argument race realists have - that IQ differences make for broken societies - vanishes
which they hopefully don't xinue
Go to bed
what if the capitalists win and hold back the technology from the public
you will outsource human Evolution to a machine?
for them
easy to control people that way
we have no idea about half of why things evolved the way they did
keep them dumb
leave nature alone
First of all, to think that *no data would leak out to public organisations,* or that *public sector doesn't ever get hold of this information* (even as right no much of this is being researched by the public sector R&D) seems highly ad hoc to me
@Bee kraWhats the difference between the capitalists you are talking about and a socialist dictator ?
Second of all, once this technology *does* get out and becomes widespread (every nation has interest in having its population at the peak, in order to remain competitive in innovation and such), it will lead to the aforementioned results. Can you argue it doesn't?
its moreso internationalist capitalism and internationalist communism, which wants to get rid of the nation through "open borders", if the communist plays that hand then that plays directly into the capitalists hand, which wants cheap labor
esp 3rd world labor
which would drive down wages
"peak", before unintended consequences show up like high iq populations having extremely low birth rate to the point of permanent disability in population replenishment
mixes, no identity, consumerism yada yada
But you stifle innovation and national competitiveness if you deny this technology full application at the national level. Furthermore, if you have to result to the capitalist to be the deus ex machina saviour, that's good evidence that the race realist position is anti-socialist and pro-capitalist.