and people will be detatched from the end product, they don't care if the mutation came from a human engineer or an AI, if it's good it's good

dumb humans maybe

by that time again, it will be socially normal to do this.

the objective then would be to heighten our species

when you realize most people vote for instant gratification instead of long term sustainability 😩

Again, it doesn't have to be like that at all

again,

this is literally a problem **only** if you *insist we stay as we are*

the transhumanist movement needs to be defeated yes

I agree

this

"let AI live in the minds of every single one of us" type of charlatan

this needs to be defeated

but that has no connection to what I propose

you can do that with literally every problem posed by anything in the world, *it's only a problem if you insist we stay as we are*

even this tech you're talking about has some constraints mate

your a Utopian individual 😄

I mean what is your solution then? Do not improve the intelligence levels of humans as they venture into this landmark century with all the perils *you clearly are aware exist?*

Seems like the losing proposition

oh no, I'm completely against this IQ Communism 😄

i realise everyone plays their part

you need the average IQ people in a society

You won't stop this at all, no chance in hell, you can only hope to *guide the technological trajectory and the trajectory of applications*

you literally won't be able to combat the transhumanists with some lame status quo policy

that will not happen

there's too much hype

now you're resorting to an argument from inevitablility instead of stating how this is actually a positive thing.

at least my viewpoint allows that we stay humans, we remain largely as we are, we will become better in many aspects but humans after 100 years will live largely as they have hitherto

and about that, i might actually agree with you.. it might well be an inevitablility

yeah but I'm not going to be defeatist about this, fuck that, I spent too much time on that already

you can always choose to see the positives and ignore the negatives to create a rosy picture and have peace of mind

You have literally no alternative to offer, beyond defeatism

I say that defeats your argument on its own

I can point to a problem whilst not having a solution, yet..
pointing to the problem is still useful mate.

I am not sure that there exists a problem, if you mean by "problem" some kind of inevitable spiralling into AI dictatorship because we use nootropics and gene-editing....

not sure why this needs to be

It's not an AI Dictatorship, anyway..

Well you know what I mean

unpleasant future revolving around AI guided evolution

i think you have enough to think about from this, nobody changes their mind on the first go lol

where dumb humans have no problem with it