Message from @Xinyue
Discord ID: 527751083867635722
that is my question to you, fren.
I do not, no
at no stage have I argued for this
that's not how people think.
that's far too long term
Perhaps make people smarter and they will be wiser? Idk??
like
what I propose is a *solution to the problem you posit*
and people will be detatched from the end product, they don't care if the mutation came from a human engineer or an AI, if it's good it's good
dumb humans maybe
by that time again, it will be socially normal to do this.
the objective then would be to heighten our species
when you realize most people vote for instant gratification instead of long term sustainability 😩
Again, it doesn't have to be like that at all
again,
this is literally a problem **only** if you *insist we stay as we are*
the transhumanist movement needs to be defeated yes
I agree
this
"let AI live in the minds of every single one of us" type of charlatan
but that has no connection to what I propose
you can do that with literally every problem posed by anything in the world, *it's only a problem if you insist we stay as we are*
even this tech you're talking about has some constraints mate
your a Utopian individual 😄
I mean what is your solution then? Do not improve the intelligence levels of humans as they venture into this landmark century with all the perils *you clearly are aware exist?*
Seems like the losing proposition
oh no, I'm completely against this IQ Communism 😄
i realise everyone plays their part
you need the average IQ people in a society
You won't stop this at all, no chance in hell, you can only hope to *guide the technological trajectory and the trajectory of applications*
you literally won't be able to combat the transhumanists with some lame status quo policy
that will not happen
there's too much hype
now you're resorting to an argument from inevitablility instead of stating how this is actually a positive thing.
at least my viewpoint allows that we stay humans, we remain largely as we are, we will become better in many aspects but humans after 100 years will live largely as they have hitherto
and about that, i might actually agree with you.. it might well be an inevitablility
yeah but I'm not going to be defeatist about this, fuck that, I spent too much time on that already
you can always choose to see the positives and ignore the negatives to create a rosy picture and have peace of mind
You have literally no alternative to offer, beyond defeatism
I say that defeats your argument on its own