@CrowGoCaw what other choice do we have?

Its worked and its failed

There's no way we can try to seize power within the "democratic system", especially in the Anglosphere

Electing left wing politicians will do well

The longer they're in power the more people we have on our side

This is what literally happened in Italy during the 20s

If accelerationism fails then what can I say

The people would've chosen their fate

The will of the people is a double edged sword

I plan to one day live on my own somewhere in Montana or elsewhere in the interior of the US

Just in general try and be ready to provide for yourself

I've been thinking about leaving my current area

Can't decide where to move though

My thoughts are either somewhere out in Eastern Washington State, Eastern Oregon, Idaho, or Eastern BC

Пigger left

https://youtu.be/dMAk3PRn5_0

all AI work that has been done in the past 20 years should be burnt to the ground

BOOMER GANG

Shabbat shalom

Shalom

> AI is too dangerous to be developed or used en masse

Well, it depends. It depends on the kind of AI in question. Narrow AI? Is probably *never* really going to be a super dangerous thing, as long as it is somewhat kept to a low scale and to a specific task, and always in conjunction with a human task giver/overseer.

General AI? Actually dangerous shit yes should not get looked into.

Don't develop it at all

Ban it

should be ban on General AI, yes, I'd agree

We can't trust ourselves to just have *a little* AI, it'll eventually become a slippery slope

nooo, no no no not quite. The kind of tech we use in narrow AI is totally different from anything that'd be capable of being human level (let alone beyond)

we don't even really understand what that would look like

there's not even blueprint for how to go about creating a vague concept

the narrow AIs themselves however will be dangerous *in certain contexts*

for example,

in situations where you'd replace all humans in military and police with them

dystopia level right there

*Looks at Xi Jinping*

Though the west will probably come around eventually

they'd be able to carry out any task, any order, any command with zero remorse or consideration for such, if they'd even possess anything resembling sentience which they indeed probably would not. You could order an narrow-AI based army to nuke Texas **for no reason** and it would obey because, well, *of course it would.* Human soldiers might revolt when faced with such command.

So there are some golden rules I have for going forward with this kind of tech:

1) limit it to narrow AI
2) ban general AI
3) limit all narrow AI to be outside police, state, military, general chain of command or offices of civil servants

but you can't possibly stop all AI development, there's far too much investment in it

by far too many people

@Xinyue the obvious solution is to replace humans with AI

so we are all on the same playing field