Message from @CronoSaturn

Discord ID: 535201328318644224


2019-01-16 20:55:48 UTC  

Ah yes the Maginot line

2019-01-16 20:55:52 UTC  

100 IQ play

2019-01-16 20:55:56 UTC  

Stop

2019-01-16 20:56:10 UTC  

the MAS-36, though it wasn’t able to fully replace other rifles by time of the invasion, was still a very good rifle

2019-01-16 20:56:21 UTC  

“de zhermans vent Aron de maginot lin”

2019-01-16 20:56:25 UTC  

Stronger than Germany but no country was really prepared to mobilise and at that low rate of preparedness Defense holds the advantage

2019-01-16 20:56:34 UTC  

Late interwar period french tanks were also very good

2019-01-16 20:56:54 UTC  

Shame they counldn't use them

2019-01-16 20:56:55 UTC  

Specifically the S-35 and Char B1

2019-01-16 20:57:07 UTC  

@CronoSaturn Hitler wasn't as powerful at the time either. And USSR proposed an alliance with France to stop the expansion of Germany, but was inevitably rejected.

2019-01-16 20:57:27 UTC  

The main thing was that the French equipment, though very good, was quite expensive to make

2019-01-16 20:57:35 UTC  

There is a reason why French tanks have one gear ahead and three gears backwards.

2019-01-16 20:57:45 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/507035890640486411/535201014656008194/1528432298352.png

2019-01-16 20:57:53 UTC  

the Char B1 was one of the better tanks any army could field in the early years of the war

2019-01-16 20:58:02 UTC  

Same with German stuff prewar

2019-01-16 20:58:05 UTC  

Keep in mind that the ussr wasn’t exactly a known factor either and that balance of power has always been the key in European politics

2019-01-16 20:58:30 UTC  

When did the USSR start expanding?

2019-01-16 20:58:35 UTC  

or unifying lol

2019-01-16 20:58:40 UTC  

In fact, the main tank used by the Germans in the early war was the Panzer I or Panzer II, mixed in with their newer and heavier tank

2019-01-16 20:58:41 UTC  

>unifying

2019-01-16 20:59:00 UTC  

And I’m not so much talking equipment quality as logistics, domestic support and deployability

2019-01-16 20:59:01 UTC  

Allies got outplayed and

2019-01-16 20:59:06 UTC  

they fucked up

2019-01-16 20:59:14 UTC  

How long did it take to defeat France again?

2019-01-16 20:59:24 UTC  

I disagree, as shown by the allies winning the war

2019-01-16 20:59:41 UTC  

The Germans held up against 4 world superpowers

2019-01-16 20:59:51 UTC  

I think losing France and the Low Countries for several years was being outplayed

2019-01-16 21:00:25 UTC  

@Deleted User Like I said, French tactics was a big thing that played out poorly for them

2019-01-16 21:00:45 UTC  

I wouldn’t call being being a divided country for decades after a stunning play

2019-01-16 21:00:57 UTC  

It was punishment

2019-01-16 21:00:58 UTC  

Don’t start fights you can’t win

2019-01-16 21:00:59 UTC  

the Germans during the Blitzkrieg mixed their armored divisions well, putting the lighter armored and armed Panzer I and Panzer II mixed in with their heavier tanks

2019-01-16 21:01:08 UTC  

They just ran out of fuel

2019-01-16 21:01:10 UTC  

@CronoSaturn Outstanding move

2019-01-16 21:01:18 UTC  

Lol

2019-01-16 21:06:00 UTC  

Point being though Anglo starting a resource war with no resources where pretty much the only country willing to trade with you is only doing so to give you enough rope?

2019-01-16 21:06:10 UTC  

Not a fantastic idea

2019-01-16 21:07:07 UTC  

Had it of just been Anschluss and Czechoslovakia we might have had a different conversation

2019-01-16 21:07:27 UTC  

But it wasn’t

2019-01-16 21:07:31 UTC  

And we arnt

2019-01-16 21:17:03 UTC  

Poland was a ally of Britain and France by the time Germany invaded