This dud eis literally babbling about nothing

The Trump rally has not even started yet and over 6,000 are online on just two I found. FNC has less than 2,000 online watching Obama 45 minutes into it.

Sorry less than 3,000 not 2.

Chris Wallace 😂 bless his heart

Obama is "master" when it comes to public speaking according to him

What are your thoughts regarding the last 2 “May not” (re: last post in q drops)

Seems to me that we don't see Q post about a party preference

The President and his staff unlikely to be even subject to the Hatch Act. They are on duty 24/7 so many provisions of it could not apply. Obviously the President can do political work.

The Hatch Act is for those outside elected office. In the many branches of Government. The FBI, CIA and on and on. It covers Government employees. However Presidential appointed employees have some limitations. They can not order their employees to break any law including the Hatch Act,. They can do politics on the job, just can not have staff who are government workers, not presidential appointed, do political work.

so hes safe.. also prob why there was the moment of silence.

We do not know who Q is. It is unlikely he or she is a government employee. Most likely a president appointed not subject to the Act.

By definition Presidential Appointed are political allies. Their job is to make sure that Presidential orders, political in nature, are carried out. Difficult to say oh this order is not politically motivated but that one is. Actual government employees live by a different standard and in some cases must say the Hatch Act does not allow me to do that.

If fired for that then they are considered a whistleblower, at least if they are correct. If not they will just lose their job.

Judges of course do not work for the President and others as well. Many do.

yup, we dont know, but wouldn't one start wondering if these individuals are government if there is such a stink to align them with breaking of the hatch act? or the deference that they have not broken the hatch act?

if it wasn't applicable to you... you don't tend to prove clear proof that you are not guilty of it... know what i mean? it wouldnt even be a talking point

The Deep State is trying to redefine the Hatch Act to include everyone. That is not reality. It will not stand if challenged by the current Supreme Court.

that's also a possibility for sure

i wouldnt put it past them to finger point and blanket smear

while they act in the same manner

@TAC page 2 https://osc.gov/resources/ha%20pamphlet%20sept%202014.pdf

oh nice, link is working now

They were working when posted... just jammed with traffic... hope they were ready for us.

the 8ch site is ready for mass bodies, but the goverment site... not so much 😛

just goes to show how impactful a Q post is

id love to see the network traffic on that link lolol

N.G. DEPLOYMENT FOR ILLINOIS AND WISCONSIN FOR ELECTION RELATED ISSUE

When I worked for the Government it was made clear to me. I was subject to the Hatch Act. I had to abide by it. However it was also made clear to me the President and those appointed by him could also do politics. Not all some could not like Judges. Others had to be careful when they did it.

Fact is no one has ever been convicted under the Hatch Act. However those appointed are far different under it than those who got their job though the normal process and those who keep their job no matter whom is President.

could have sworn there was an emoji for... "crickets".

anyone here very strong in the clintom/pedophilia issue?

my friend (another youtuber) is asking me for any specific citations to give skeptics.

I know there were some wikileaked emails, but a lot of it is preponderance of the evidence/reasoning through their symbolism. What hard evidence can I share? I've forgotten half the stuff I've learned about this issue because It's so vast

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6343443/Commando-raids-Finnish-islands-spark-fears-used-secret-Russian-military-bases.html

please DM me if so

War Room

https://www.infowars.com/war-room/

War Room with Owen Shroyer – MAGA One Radio

https://magaoneradio.net/shows/war-room-with-owen-shroyer/

WOW CNBC.....ALERT HEADLINE https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/20/trump-poised-to-take-control-of-the-federal-reserve.html?__source=sharebar%7Cfacebook&par=sharebar

very premature but it makes for a seeding

@Dustin Nemos have them look into Cathy O’Brien. She wrote about both Clinton’s in her book Tranceformation. It’s on scribed I believe and you can search for Clinton to find that part maybe page 172ish if memory serves

I think q may be posting now someone mentioned it in the live chat for speech. I have to run for a bit