Message from @Montague Brinkmann
Discord ID: 511271263344394272
And Chernobyl radiation probably
Go to Switzerland one way fares start at about $600 bucks but you cant live there until you open a bank account
I wonder if less chemtrails though...
>States should have voter ID cards
what's wrong with using normal ID cards or permits/DLs?
That's how it's done already in states with voter ID as the law.
And it's not super easy to get one either, plus you have to sign up to vote.
You need a proof of citizenship (birth cert), money, proof of address _twice_, and fill out several forms.
"Against 1: Vote secrecy is not guaranteed
According to data protection specialists, e-voting invalidates voting secrecy because not all transactions are comprehensible to the voter. The systems currently available cannot protect privacy in the user environment, meaning that a malware-infected computer could violate the confidentiality of the vote.
Against 2: Elections and votes can be manipulated
The biggest problem, say critics, are security risks such as hacking, vote-buying and other manipulations. By introducing a virus into a computer, votes could be altered. If elections or votes can be manipulated on a large scale by criminals, foreign intelligence services or companies, this would mean the end of democracy, critics warn.
Against 3: A recount is not possible
Unlike physical ballots, electronic votes cannot be counted manually. With e-voting, the counting is done centrally. There are no individuals to add up votes or election observers who ensure that the voting process runs smoothly and checks are carried out. Citizens must blindly trust the e-voting system.
Against 4: E-voting is expensive
Opponents argue that the costs of e-voting are extortionate: at least CHF700 million ($736 million) would be required to introduce e-voting across Switzerland. An electronically delivered vote is considerably more expensive than a vote posted in an envelope.
Against 5: The introduction of e-voting is undemocratic
Two-thirds of all cantons may in theory vote electronically by 2019. However, the legal basis for this is still lacking and should be finalised only in 2020/21. That is when parliament and voters – if there is a referendum - will be able to decide. Critics complain that e-voting is therefore being introduced prematurely and without any democratic decision."
Holy Sh!% Folks... here comes D5+ ... Q is unleashed. Enjoy the show. https://screenshots.firefox.com/1mLst1poV3Zpm5e6/qntmpkts.keybase.pub ��
I can't imagine if e-voting is allowed here; most likely that means the dems would be winning even more here in California; whenever there's a large voter turnout, it usually means more liberal votes, although I suppose there could be a many voters that never vote due to busy lifestyles/forgetfulness that would vote red, even here in CA if e-voting was allowed.
NICE!!
Just as Q promised regarding 11/11....
Esp. since we can't get that military parade until next year
On that note, I have to remember to call my grandfather later regarding veteran's day; he's 97/WWII veteran and still going strong.
>a malware-infected computer could violate the confidentiality of the vote
if you aren't technically literate enough to feel that your computer is secure or not, then just go vote in person imo
>Elections and votes can be manipulated
not if you have to put in all the info you do to sign up to vote
>recount is not possible
sounds like a pro to me, less room for error
>E-voting is expensive
hmm, interesting
very accesible though, probably better, and doesn't kill trees
>The introduction of e-voting is undemocratic
Voting is undemocratic
ok
noted lol
just my thinking lol
Looks like Q/Trump is now fighting fire with fire. Lovin' it!!
Literally fighting fire with fire
The deep state will be going down in flames soon in a fire that they literally created; they've been burying themselves their own graves all this time.
I like how Tennessee does it though:
Electronic ballots with voter ID required, there is no online voting, paper ballots as a back up only, recounts not really necessary
also happy veterans day
That somewhat depends on the fish... lol
VERY
especially # 2487
😁
FFs failing intended purposes, misdirection techniques failing, the snares are set, the lures are in the water, implosion is immanent.
I literally cannot focus on anything today.....
This is all I can think about
IDF IN BLACKHAWK DOWN SITUATION IN GAZA...TAKING HEAVY FIRE
😆
Can anybody explain to me what "placeholder" implies?
Oh great, I get a minute to check in and no one is here lol! Will try again later!
a placeholder is a piece of text or a picture in a layout that will be replaced by the actual thing mentioned in the text when it becomes available.
Q implies we are going to get actual proof this week on a daily basis 🍿 also expect some disinformation
Ya hes saying something will be here later
Would be great if the ‘later’ was later today!! Eeekkk
@R1V37H34D what do you mean?