Message from @Knefel

Discord ID: 552937606732840988


2019-03-06 19:31:25 UTC  

that should stop RPGs

2019-03-06 19:31:51 UTC  

but it's likely not enough against modern russian KE penetrators like Svinets-1 and 2

2019-03-06 19:32:11 UTC  

Russians don't use APFSDS as their main shell

2019-03-06 19:32:11 UTC  

and the are above the driver's hatch is still only steel

2019-03-06 19:32:19 UTC  

ye they do

2019-03-06 19:32:26 UTC  

they have since the T-62

2019-03-06 19:32:31 UTC  

They have and always will focus on ATGM and HEAT-FS

2019-03-06 19:32:46 UTC  

Their ATGM's are by far the most dangerous weapon in their arsenal

2019-03-06 19:33:09 UTC  

125mm tank gun HEAT-FS hasn't changed significantly since the T-64

2019-03-06 19:33:21 UTC  

Um, u wot

2019-03-06 19:33:31 UTC  

gun-launched ATGMs are also mediocore because you can't increase their caliber

2019-03-06 19:33:35 UTC  

They have changed SIGNIFICANTLY

2019-03-06 19:33:46 UTC  

They have triple-charge HEAT-FS

2019-03-06 19:34:32 UTC  

that still does jack shit against western composites

2019-03-06 19:34:37 UTC  

wew lad

2019-03-06 19:34:56 UTC  

their best ATGMs are helo and vehicle-based

2019-03-06 19:35:22 UTC  

since a gun tube or a soldier's carrying capacity doesn't limit their weight or size

2019-03-06 19:35:30 UTC  

The fact you think MBT armor can handle triple-HEAT means your opinion is irrelevant.

2019-03-06 19:36:05 UTC  

It required a complete redesign of ERA panels and their moutings to even begin to counter triple-HEAT warheads.

2019-03-06 19:36:29 UTC  

double and triple warheads are only effective against ERA panels

2019-03-06 19:36:38 UTC  

western MBTs don't rely on ERA

2019-03-06 19:36:49 UTC  

And they also defeat composite armor.

2019-03-06 19:37:03 UTC  

Spacing and ceramic inserts are not invincible

2019-03-06 19:37:40 UTC  

a single-stage warhead is just as effective against NERA and passive composites as a single-staged warhead

2019-03-06 19:37:52 UTC  

Newer triple charges are rated up to nearly 3000mm, including composites.

2019-03-06 19:37:59 UTC  

hwat?

2019-03-06 19:38:09 UTC  

where did you get *that* number

2019-03-06 19:38:28 UTC  

the best HEAT warheads are rated at *maybe* 1500mm

2019-03-06 19:38:33 UTC  

Last I looked there was a triple-HEAT with nearly 3000mm of penetration RHA.

2019-03-06 19:38:58 UTC  

and a 125mm diameter tank-launched one won't even break 1000mm

2019-03-06 19:39:12 UTC  

You can think that all you want until they do.

2019-03-06 19:40:53 UTC  

Chobham-type composites are 3,5 times as effective against HEAT warheads as against kinetic penetrators

2019-03-06 19:41:50 UTC  

since Russian KE penetrators go up to ~900mm of pen, their ATGMs would need to break 3k mm to be *as effective*

2019-03-06 19:42:38 UTC  

and with current tech, to achieve penetration like that you'd need a warhead so massive, you might as well use a 250kg bomb

2019-03-06 19:43:06 UTC  

Well the Russians certainly think they're good enough, and so does NATO.

2019-03-06 19:43:27 UTC  

That's what they want you to thin

2019-03-06 19:43:30 UTC  

k

2019-03-06 19:43:44 UTC  

I'm going to go with triple-HEAT is rendering conventional armor irrelevant

2019-03-06 19:44:05 UTC  

Which is why we're seeing a huge shift towards active protection and nanocomposite alloys.

2019-03-06 19:44:51 UTC  

Even wiki calls bullshit on that one

2019-03-06 19:44:53 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/491045043633782784/552939683886137354/unknown.png