Even then Z we can make artificial wombs so

the main biological difference is that women are irrational and they say one thing but do another

Well granted they can do it much cheaper

u can make an egg from sperm but not sperm from an egg... u need both... the women lack the y chromosone... so r not needed n a technological process

interesting

with an artificial womb... already bein tested n genetically modified pigs.... women r outmoded

genetically modified pigs r already bringing sheep fetuses to term.... only a matter of time b4 they can do primates

can you immagine what our growth as a society would have been without women ?

they litterly hold men back

weak and ignorant men will say we hate women

we dont

we see them for what they are

civilizations always fall due to gynocentrism/statism.... no women would solve the the fermi paradox at least

and what they are isn't the least likable

the conflict between gynocentrism and statism is a direct reflection of the reproductive instincts.... gynocentrism is extreme hypergamy... statism is extreme dominance... one or both of these has to b solved to stop the civilizational rise n fall cycle....

could replace women

with tech

and in the meantime instill a soft patriarchy through religion or war or gender segregation....now but what about the flurry of objections to every fookin solution or temporary fix ever put forth

soft patriarchy won't work.... gives rise to tradcons which restarts the cycle

the romans tried it... only slowed it down a bit....

I was just trying to point out...no matter what is put forth it will inevitably be rejected because no one actually wants a soluton because they don't see a problem

the romans only exceeded the general ten generation cycle rule bcuz they allowed heads of households to mete out capital punishment until 500yrs b4 they fell... it was all downhill for them after that...

thats a hard patriarchy😉

the solution is actually simple but prolly too late for this cycle... take women out of the gatekeeper role for reproduction and don't allow men to create extreme statism... not an easy nut to crack

then u don't need women for reproduction and u don't have the state to enforce extreme gynocentrism....

till then u will have the cycle....

why do i feel like tyrell talkin to roy n blade runner?....lol

XD

when the romans began taking away men's power they went to a soft patriarchy n then devolved into traditional conservatives which was the opening gynocentrism needed to go extreme... game over...

intresting

the amazing thing is how long the romans lasted simply by maintaining a hard patriarchy...

Regimented monogamy was a big part.

i was a cultural anthropologist who studied cultural development and psycologies for 50yrs... m retired now but still like to keep up with it all... why m here actually😉

knowledge is power

Would you consider obligatory marriage part of “hard patriarchy”, zi?

but w/out understanding knowledge is next to useless....

true

yes it is...572

for the women

And for the men? A Roman male citizen of marriageable age really only had the illusion of choice when it came to getting hitched.

extreme statism... dominance... is not a predicate of stability.... marriage and reproduction... therefore hypergamey... is