the Wall is a trad con distraction: 20 thousand border patrol agents with sensors would be more effective and cost 90 % less than the wall

30 % of the border land is own by USA citizens, the government would need to seize land

now u know majority of women voted for trump right: so i seems kind of ironic that MGTOW ppl vote with women

yes

53% of white women voted for trump

feminism has infiltrated both parties

they control bath sides

both*

white women only care about maintaining child support, alimony and full child custody preferences

the republicans were they original feminists with traditionalism

im about forcing everyone to treat women equally to men so i can take all their privileges always

women had more privileges and protections in the past, and they have been slowly losing them, but recently, this me-too nonsense and intersectional feminism has slowed this down

the husband was responsible for the women, even her crimes, all women did was stay home and look pretty

well b4 , they didnt even get arrest, the husband would get in trouble

there was practically no female prisons in the past

slowly the female prison has increased, only slowed down by the white knight judges

major alpha

hahaha

kind of strange that some traps are infiltrating MGTOW and red pill channels

traps have a mental disorder and thus have a female brain

they did a CT scan on traps and were similar 2 female brains

yes yes, attention sluts like female

😂

i think we need to re-frame the argument: not say take women's rights away but take women's privileges away

if women are equal 2 men, they should have no privileges or special treatment

is simple, i do it all the time, but is the white knights that slow us down

women equally vote for most parties

bith i mean

any MGTOW here who has legal expertise

Yes, DDJ should have kept in private, i miss him in the show since i also have legal experience

but not family law, but criminal law

nothing wrong with having girlfriend or only smashing and dashing, but if he lied about it, not kool

given my legal expertise , i do have some doubts on DDJ'S story with his kids

SJW was supposed 2 only be 4 black ppl and oppressed ppl, but feminism has co-opted, like women always do when they see benefits

white women are the most privilege class, anointed by white knights

everyone plays games: i know a judge that plays games in his chambers lol

yes games can be addicting

it has been classify as an addiction 4 some

i need everyone 2 listen 2 my advice and always secretly record all ur interactions with women 2 safeguard against false accusations. it will always be admissible in court, albeit it was a clandestine recording. this only applies 2 USA however.

thats my goal in joining MGTOW and red pill groups, to help men in this regard

i elaborated on this a few times in TFM videos and others similar

ok s when u secretly record someone, it can always be used as exculpatory evidence in court,

the supremacy clause trumps any state or federal law prohibiting its admissibility in court

the supremacy clause essentially signifies that the federal constitution is the supreme law of the land

and the federal constitution, as construed by supreme court, mandates that all exculpatory evidence be admitted regardless of its means used to obtain it

there are numerous opinions by supreme court wherein it declared certain state laws to be unconstitutional because it was prohibiting admission of exculpatory evidence

now of course, even though u can use it as a defense against any accusation, u are still risking an arrest, but usually it is merely a misdemeanor or a minor offense . i rather get arrested for a minor offense than rape, but please bear in mind that there are exceptions codified in law that protects ppl from unlawful recording arrest. every state has slightly different exceptions , so sometimes u still will be in the clear

theres always the choice of evil doctrine which exempts ppl from getting arrested 4 a crime

this common law means that u can commit a crime to prevent another crime: a good analogy is committing reckless driving because u speed and pass red light cuz u taking ur friend 2 hospital cuz he got shot

no federal constitution trumps any state law, please read my prior statement hereinbefore

like i said, even even if California or any state prohibits its use, the federal constitution trumps it

all this applies to USA , so any other country, im unsure

no

i was a public defender

also an appellate attorney at a state AG's office

oh yes

heres one case wherein a state law was declared unconstitutional because it prohibit admission of a certain exculpatory evidence Holmes v. South Carolina :: 547 U.S. 319 (2006)

that cased was based on established law

was going 2 cite wed site with actual opinion but wont let me herein

well yes, the defendant was convicted of murder in state court

yes but the evidence he was trying 2 use was flimsy at best because it was third part hearsay

but the supreme court said essentially it doesnt matter how questionable the evidence is: if its potentially exculpatory, it must be admitted

yes but my point is

a recording can never be questioned to be fake

no

i used that case all the time

exculpatory evidence can never be excluded in USA, regardless how it was obtain

is not applicable to child support or alimony based upon it legislative history

im not versed on family law as much as criminal law: thats y i was mad when DDJ got crazy

im just trying 2 enlighten my fellow red pill men on how 2 safeguard against false accusations . thats my goal here

yes

but is not as bad as u think lol

essentially the law says exculpatory evidence can still be used as long as its disclosed 2 prosecution b4 trial

so i can see a scenario wherein right b4 a rape-trial, u email a video of the consensual fucking lol

yes

but actually in USA, the law is the same

unless u ascertain evidence during trial

so unfortunately, u cant do surprise evidence in USA, except for impeachment evidence

i have exploited this exception b4 when i know a witness is going to lie

impeachment evidence means evidence that shows a witness lied

im only a former trial attorney: i only smash and dash the ladies lol

she is using her

tell her she is a prostitute

she is using u i mean

tell her u didnt know she was a prostitute, that if she wants money again, she needs to let u copulate first lol

fuck the white knights: shame them, call them a pussy slave

fuck i hate the females that used men like that

i been there, i know how it is

tell them involuntary servitude has been abolished by the 13th amendment (Xychotix). they are free from being slaves 2 the pussy lol

😂

peace, remember what i said: im being serious on that

im sure ill write it 100 times more here and many other red pill channels, so u will see it again: thats my mission here

yes, u must be cognizant on female nature b4 interacting with them

luckily there'r plenty of content in the internet thereon

but remember guys: always secretly record all interactions with females--at least audio record with phone--because, as i said b4, exculpatory (innocent) evidence is always admissible in USA

😂

ill change it 4 u

@Whats gay anymore ill change it 4 u

@Whats gay anymore how about now 😂

the legal Alpha is upon u😂