Message from @Oliver Starley
Discord ID: 425684408998297602
Holy shit, I haven't seen that other face before. Still just as hideous
Flagrant Clickbait.
You've got to be kidding me with this shit. Build the wall yesterday, motherfucker.
It was less than half of total offenders though. That means something, if you close your eyes, and feel bad for all the people that came here over a decade ago, and never once tried to apply for citizenship.
it’s financially unfair for men to get married, goy
think of the cost-benefit analysis of loving someone
Teachers too
It's because society is geared to teach whites and males they need to be objective about things. While at the same time the deeper into the progressive stack you are the more biased you are allowed to act and that's okay.
yeah I watched it and I can see that
When's poland going to elect an antipope? There's historical precedence for it.
Antipope?
What on earth is that?
The Orthodox Patriarch?
There are multiple orthodox patriarchs
@ebowden from 1309 to 1376, seven successive popes decided to make their seat at Avignon.
In 1376, Gregory IX decided to move back to Rome, but his cardinals disagreed. Which led to the Western Schism under the reign of his successor, Urban VI
A second line of Avignon popes reigned, concurrent with those serving in Rome.
At one point during the schism, no less than three different men simultaneously led claim to the title of true pope
The seat of the pope was not even initially so prominent in christendom. The heir to the throne of St. Peter was but one of five church fathers before the reign of Charlemagne and the crusades.
So what you're saying is, there has never been a true pope?
we are all the pope
There's only been a "true pope" (the word pope itself comes from papa, denoting one of the five church fathers) for as long as the Latin Church was able to establish its will by military force, but the bishop of Rome derives his legitimacy from being the heir of St. Peter
Who Jesus declared was the "rock" (Petrus) on which the church would be built.
What I'm getting from this was that He was being metaphorical?
Somewhat. I doubt he would have wanted a singular office to become so entrenched and corrupt or to hold so much individual power.
But he definitely wanted Peter to lead the church after he was gone.
And I doubt Peter wanted for the bishopric of Rome to become the way it is.
Leave it to us to screw everything up as always
I bet this is what led to that baseless Mary worship also. She's important and is to be revered, but she's not part of the trinity.