Message from @GoGo
Discord ID: 286337164609060864
and in anarchocapitalism it'll prob be a corporate state that'll give rise to a king
or conglomerate
>we all are made by the same great God
which isn't bad in and of itself but meh
fedoras BTFO
Anything that settles will always rot, personally my ideal body politic is a dynamic one that alters its superficial organs often enough to clean any negligent or malicious agents out before they can even attempt to entrench their power base. But even that is exploitable, so there isn't ever really an ideal that works for too long.
Did the wendy's twitter account get suspended?
my ideal political body is a weak monarchy that has a counterbalanced weak parliament/congress that is elected by stronger state officials to run international matters or declare war outside of the union/confederacy with state law superceeding federal law
state governments directly elected, federal not
Minarchist, one vote per house ethnostate for me thankyouverymuch.
Who chooses federal government?
the represenatives of the state houses
And the people vote for them^
yes
10,000 year psychic holy god-emperor bls
and IDEALLY The king is hard to remove but not unremovable, and less a force of law more a force of direction and diplomacy
Motherfuckers....
Does each state have it's own military or is it ran federally?
Rest in rip
I'd say 33 state 67 feds, one matter where they overule state just for the sake of efficiency, but can only override the state on home soil when invaded
What happens when two populated states decide to join together to force their will on the rest of the country? I.e. NY+CA
You say that like you would expect the territories to be invaded
Morons
We need an AntiCom Memerine Corps
Semper Feelius
Goddamn tards ruining perfectly unsuspecting datasources
#triggeredlikeanigger
@Tee CA Civil war if it's military force, otherwise the states would just tell them to fuck off because the only other ways they can enforce it is economically but they don't survive on their own as is
@Void What would the citizens rights be?
determined at state level
Convention of states
yeah if there's any unifying bill of rights it would be decided by that
Repeal acts by 2/3 majority
Even supreme court decisions
@Void If rights could be determined by states a bill of rights would be needed to set basic rights for people.
no supreme court, since the federal doesn't overwrite the states the state courts would outrank it anyways