@Andrew The Meme King , it's Weird, i can add a Reaction to Every Text Channel except for General text

Hmmmmmmmm

Try now

🍻

***I've made a grave mistake***

...

XD

@Turd Flinging Monkey Thank for the answer man I thinking about this theme a lot. And I think that a big change is in the horizon

sex dolls are just the beggining

I have just awoken from probably the most horrific nightmare I've ever experienced.

Just to be thrusted into the next inevitable fit of terror.

Imagine being confined in a prison but the only key to your freedom leads only to the realization of another space of enslavement.

Now that, gentlemen, is horror.

The real horror as a white man is to awaken in our feminist and gynosentric socity

Now THATS Scary

We are the all singing, all dancing crap of the world

@the adventures male there are worse things.

@Leather Collector I am Jack's smirking revenge.

I am Jack's inflamed sense of rejection

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise

@Seven Of Swords i don't know man, having a Dick is Wayy better than having a vagina , at least you still got that

Imagine being born with neither or both...

Both would be a mind fuck, Neither would be more asexual

Which is worse?

both

Interesting. How so?

isn't it obvious?? your only suppose to have like one sex organ

Well if you didn't have either, would that also mean that your body is void of any testosterone ane estrogen?

*and

What says that you are only supposed to only have one sex organ?

@Leather Collector Maybe? Unless you get injections lol

LOL, im not gonna go into detail of common sense biology

As far as I'm concerned, none of biology is "common sense". The more I look into biology, the more qustions appear.

Yeah but would you even need either? If you have no reproductive value then there would probably be no point in having either one. Unless of course they serve other purposes aside from sexual reproduction; which they probably do, but I wouldn't know

Look into evolutionary structures as being spandrels.

Very interesting research.

It could be the case that many structures of our secondary sex characteristics may have been not necessarily made for reproductive fitness, but instead could be spandrel like additions that may have been selected for without necessarily being reproductively advantageous.

Yeah that makes sense. Kinda like how our cells unintentionally began using mitochondria as a means for energy production

Yet, just because cells use a mitochondria, it is not necessarily the case that perhaps some other structure could have been selected for that could fulfill the same function, yet be structurally different than a mitochondria itself.