That's also a non-issue here.

We also have people sunbathing their breasts here for example.

I don't think it's a problem with *white people* anyway.

I think women have an instinctive selfishness which is supposed to help them have children, but they've chucked out the having children and kept the selfishness.

Breastfeeding is fine but you have to do it in a modest manner

don't just whip out a tit

put a blanket or something on top of the baby

They think they just innately deserve things because they are women.

Like I said, probably not an issue in a white ethno-state.

absolutely fine. anyone not comfortable can be a grown up and turn away rather than having an sjw-esque breakdown

it's natural and we need to make our women feel comfortable and natural about having kids

Exactly!

How many kids do you have, Housewife?

@Fallskjermjeger - at this present time, none. Soon though. Once Brad graduates from University.

Ah, okay.

Good thing you have a nice bf at least though.

@MartelMosley Every time they tell us they need something else to have kids they reward us with fewer children.

'they' - are you married to all the White women in the Western World?

I understand your point

wdym?

in the sense that they, too, have been designated a 'minority' and have therefore been handed a licence to moan and get gibs whilst not always doing their part

however, for the most-part, women need men to have kids

get married to a woman who you know wants kids and produce

Women are the majority.

so are POCs...

And whites

Globally speaking here ofc

in the case of women, I'm not sure the numbers really matter. they're told they have minority status (wage gap, sexism, etc)

my point being is that Lester tells us they give us fewer and fewer children

as men, we need to be choosing White women who want kids

and producing as many as possible

Exactly.

Choose women with good features that wants to have at least 3 kids.

That's a starter

And you have to keep giving her very subtle redpills, so by the time you are married she should be somewhat based compared to normies.

I agree

It's a complex situation with many variables involved.

On the female side of the equation you have:
- Anti-natalist propaganda telling women having several children is selfish.
- Anti-natalist propaganda telling women that having kids takes up your time better spent having fun, travelling, drinking, experimenting, etc.
- Anti-natalist propaganda telling women that settling down with a man and a family prevents their sexual liberation and their capacity to 'try every flavour' with an (((accent))) on the 'exotic'.
- Third-wave feminist propaganda telling women that their time is better spent in the boardroom and treating men as inferior.
- Rising costs which make women anxious as to how they will fund child-raising. They are therefore all in competition for the richer men of which the % is dwindling.
- Etc.

On the male side:
- Wage compression making it harder to support a family and present yourself to women as a viable life partner for child-raising.
- Rising anger and anxiety over the current situation and life in general making them less appealing targets for women who are used to seeing laid-back, carefree men on the TV, in magazines, etc.
- Rising anger against women promulgated by (((them))) to divide us. This is done by (((their))) support of third-wave feminism. Despondency is also an issue.
- Competing for the few women who are racially minded AND want kids (although the two tend to go hand-in-hand).
- Etc.

It's a fucking catastrophe and the anger and conflict between the sexes is relentlessly amplified.

Pin this?