Messages from @MartelMosley (Discord ID: 331165540347412481)
168 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
How's the AltRight movement faring over there Lisa?
I'm stuck in London. Try finding a based woman here...
yh but then they'd have a load of low level IQ, low-impulse control niglets to deal with
but it allows me to donate to the AltRight
yeah paying taxes is a little blackpilling
but I look younger than most people in the North of the UK
probably paid better than most of us too...
I spoke to Martin Sellner, he doesn't want anti-semitism in the movement
he does, however, acknowledge that most jews are of the lfetist-liberal ilk
and that there are a lot opf them in the media
absolutely fine. anyone not comfortable can be a grown up and turn away rather than having an sjw-esque breakdown
it's natural and we need to make our women feel comfortable and natural about having kids
'they' - are you married to all the White women in the Western World?
in the sense that they, too, have been designated a 'minority' and have therefore been handed a licence to moan and get gibs whilst not always doing their part
however, for the most-part, women need men to have kids
get married to a woman who you know wants kids and produce
in the case of women, I'm not sure the numbers really matter. they're told they have minority status (wage gap, sexism, etc)
my point being is that Lester tells us they give us fewer and fewer children
as men, we need to be choosing White women who want kids
It's a complex situation with many variables involved.
On the female side of the equation you have:
- Anti-natalist propaganda telling women having several children is selfish.
- Anti-natalist propaganda telling women that having kids takes up your time better spent having fun, travelling, drinking, experimenting, etc.
- Anti-natalist propaganda telling women that settling down with a man and a family prevents their sexual liberation and their capacity to 'try every flavour' with an (((accent))) on the 'exotic'.
- Third-wave feminist propaganda telling women that their time is better spent in the boardroom and treating men as inferior.
- Rising costs which make women anxious as to how they will fund child-raising. They are therefore all in competition for the richer men of which the % is dwindling.
On the male side:
- Wage compression making it harder to support a family and present yourself to women as a viable life partner for child-raising.
- Rising anger and anxiety over the current situation and life in general making them less appealing targets for women who are used to seeing laid-back, carefree men on the TV, in magazines, etc.
- Rising anger against women promulgated by (((them))) to divide us. This is done by (((their))) support of third-wave feminism. Despondency is also an issue.
- Competing for the few women who are racially minded AND want kids (although the two tend to go hand-in-hand).
It's a fucking catastrophe and the anger and conflict between the sexes is relentlessly amplified.
I found myself once on a date with a British woman who was 26yo (myself being 27). She was a solid 7 out of 10. At the time, I was working a financial audit job for a big 4 accounting firm. As such, I had very little time for anything social. Despite my heavy reservations, I jumped on tinder as it solved the time problem (though evidently not the quality problem as we're about to see).
Anyway, this girl was blonde and blue-eyed and had come from the countryside where she had led a relatively sheltered life. She was working as a manager for nurses who visit the elderly in homes (she had previously been working as such a nurse herself). So we went on a date.
I have found subtle ways of enquiring as to who a girl has been with in the past and what her sexual history might be like. I managed to discover that this particular girl had burned the coal having moved from the countryside to London. She was even proud of it. Her explanation was 'well it's not unusual given London is a multicultural city'.
Suffice it to say there was no second date.
Bizarrely enough however, she was anti-islam and anti-Sharia law so there was that but my over-riding thought? 'I'm not venturing where the groid has planted his flag (so-to-speak) before me'.
Who is giving them more crap? I'm certainly not advocating for it. Like I said, by giving them minority status, you enable giving them more for nothing. Who pushes for equating them to an oppressed minority? (((Who indeed)))...
@Lester Cordell re-read what I wrote. I said breastfeeding in public (which is currently legal so not giving them anything new) is perfectly natural and acceptable. I said that we should make them feel comfortable in having more children. I'm not espousing giving them more of anything that doesn't aid that objective.
probably given that pre-war German posters show just that
Here's what I think: the breastfeeding debate was put out there by the media (in the UK at least) to make a big deal out of something that was of little consequence and was virtually a non-issue. Why was this done? To antagonise both the male and female side of the equation so that they would be further divided. This would support the pro-third wave feminist issue and the angry/anxious side of men that generally repels women (see above) thus driving the wedge between us even further which ultimately serves to drive down birth rates. It is part of a multi-faceted attack on male-female relationships, communication and understanding (other examples include purposeful gender confusion, the wage gap myth, the campus rape culture myth, etc).
THIS ULTIMATELY SERVES TO LOWER WHITE BIRTH RATES.
Personally, I think a lot of women don't breastfeed in public precisely because they don't like the idea of displaying themselves and an intimate connection between mother and child. men don't like it for almost precisely the same reason (plus it can be viewed as a gratuitous display of course). Who pushes the idea that woman can, and therefore SHOULD, breastfeed in public (therefore prompting antagony and friction between both sides)? (((Who))) indeed...
Again, I'll use the UK as an example as it is what I know; males hailing from the third world commit a disproportionate amount of the sexual crime. The media relays this to the public as being purely a 'male' problem and overlooks the foreign element completely. Thus, they drive the wedge even further. Who controls the media? (((Who))) indeed...
the paywall asks for too many personal details for my liking...
We may well have had the Industrial Revolution first, but we'll have the Racial Revolution last it seems...
The idea that our society is now so inextricably intertwined with multiculturalism, that removing it would be tantamount to removing a vital organ, pervades amongst our people like air...
They are gambling that we will ultimately loose.
They are like children who can not help themselves.
It didn't work for the Germans, why should it work now?
And that's if you believe the official story on the holocaust...
Yes, the game has changed and yet they are still referring to rules dating back decades. This is why our movement exists and is thriving.
But we can never let up. We still operate within a framework that they have created (most notably legally and societally).
Aren't there less absurd ways of getting back at your parent(s)?
Lisa, you want to be blackpilled even further, illegal immigrants working with cash in hand pay no tax
I console myself by donating a significant amount to AR causes
@erz1871 that's the exact meme I was thinking of!
ah so they can steal from the dead in the US too...
should we be worried about the personal details required for the TRS paywall?
talking about the poz over and over can't be easy on anybody's mentality tbh
GIFs are too damned long these days
they know about remaining homogenous fam
@weev what's your take on the red ice hack?
what can they do with the info they have?
@weev what can antifa do with the personal details they have stolen? I can't remember what personal deiials were required to subscribe.
@weev I paid through paypal. In fact I think that was the only way. They won't get that info surely
all of this is a little blackpilling tbh fam
I know there's not much they can do although how antifa got the members list... (if that's true)
I wasn't there for that; in bed before it was even announced
But didn't see anybody mention it today
Never get too invested. It was inevitable really.
@Wilford we're setting the place up. There'll be a process but we're slowing down membership for now
@SDifference I like the counter-argument against tactical nihilism and will be stealing it for future use. Thank you.
I liked the idea of trolling antifa; announcing a rally but only doing the tiki-torch march and not turning up the next day.
See all the blakbloc turn up with nobody to focus their hate on so they turn it on the city and chimp out.
@SDifference I agree to an extent but the number of people that still follow the MSM's narrative verbatim...
If you tell a normie about how it was a set-up, even with proof, you'll be labelled a conspiracy theorist.
@everyone the team is busy atm making this place as excellent as possible. I'll be free this weekend to get on the vetting so things will open up a bit more in a couple of days. Please bear with us. Patience is a (White) virtue.
It's happening but think of it this way: one you're in, you don't have to worry about all the stupid shit thanks to vetting.
That's the spirit! We're creating channels, a bot and vetting all at once
Let's build the base properly to enable a cohesive structure.
Imagine dating a girl more radically right than you...
We'd get all sort of betas becoming nazis just to get laid
@badtanman is right in the sense that we already have our betas
But a movement needs followers as well as leaders
Or followers who dream of being leaders
All the doxxing and shutting down evidently shook some of our more prominent goys
Don't blame them tbh. I had a sense of malaise all of last week.
168 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.