They think they just innately deserve things because they are women.

Like I said, probably not an issue in a white ethno-state.

absolutely fine. anyone not comfortable can be a grown up and turn away rather than having an sjw-esque breakdown

it's natural and we need to make our women feel comfortable and natural about having kids

Exactly!

How many kids do you have, Housewife?

@Fallskjermjeger - at this present time, none. Soon though. Once Brad graduates from University.

Ah, okay.

Good thing you have a nice bf at least though.

@MartelMosley Every time they tell us they need something else to have kids they reward us with fewer children.

'they' - are you married to all the White women in the Western World?

I understand your point

wdym?

in the sense that they, too, have been designated a 'minority' and have therefore been handed a licence to moan and get gibs whilst not always doing their part

however, for the most-part, women need men to have kids

get married to a woman who you know wants kids and produce

Women are the majority.

so are POCs...

And whites

Globally speaking here ofc

in the case of women, I'm not sure the numbers really matter. they're told they have minority status (wage gap, sexism, etc)

my point being is that Lester tells us they give us fewer and fewer children

as men, we need to be choosing White women who want kids

and producing as many as possible

Exactly.

Choose women with good features that wants to have at least 3 kids.

That's a starter

And you have to keep giving her very subtle redpills, so by the time you are married she should be somewhat based compared to normies.

I agree

It's a complex situation with many variables involved.

On the female side of the equation you have:
- Anti-natalist propaganda telling women having several children is selfish.
- Anti-natalist propaganda telling women that having kids takes up your time better spent having fun, travelling, drinking, experimenting, etc.
- Anti-natalist propaganda telling women that settling down with a man and a family prevents their sexual liberation and their capacity to 'try every flavour' with an (((accent))) on the 'exotic'.
- Third-wave feminist propaganda telling women that their time is better spent in the boardroom and treating men as inferior.
- Rising costs which make women anxious as to how they will fund child-raising. They are therefore all in competition for the richer men of which the % is dwindling.
- Etc.

On the male side:
- Wage compression making it harder to support a family and present yourself to women as a viable life partner for child-raising.
- Rising anger and anxiety over the current situation and life in general making them less appealing targets for women who are used to seeing laid-back, carefree men on the TV, in magazines, etc.
- Rising anger against women promulgated by (((them))) to divide us. This is done by (((their))) support of third-wave feminism. Despondency is also an issue.
- Competing for the few women who are racially minded AND want kids (although the two tend to go hand-in-hand).
- Etc.

It's a fucking catastrophe and the anger and conflict between the sexes is relentlessly amplified.

Pin this?

I found myself once on a date with a British woman who was 26yo (myself being 27). She was a solid 7 out of 10. At the time, I was working a financial audit job for a big 4 accounting firm. As such, I had very little time for anything social. Despite my heavy reservations, I jumped on tinder as it solved the time problem (though evidently not the quality problem as we're about to see).

Anyway, this girl was blonde and blue-eyed and had come from the countryside where she had led a relatively sheltered life. She was working as a manager for nurses who visit the elderly in homes (she had previously been working as such a nurse herself). So we went on a date.

I have found subtle ways of enquiring as to who a girl has been with in the past and what her sexual history might be like. I managed to discover that this particular girl had burned the coal having moved from the countryside to London. She was even proud of it. Her explanation was 'well it's not unusual given London is a multicultural city'.

Suffice it to say there was no second date.

Bizarrely enough however, she was anti-islam and anti-Sharia law so there was that but my over-riding thought? 'I'm not venturing where the groid has planted his flag (so-to-speak) before me'.

@MartelMosley Yes Martel I am daring to speak of all women.

Why do you think giving them more crap they didn't have when they had lots of kids will make them have kids again?

Where is your evidence?

The only thing we should expect to work is approximating the conditions of when we last had success.

Who is giving them more crap? I'm certainly not advocating for it. Like I said, by giving them minority status, you enable giving them more for nothing. Who pushes for equating them to an oppressed minority? (((Who indeed)))...

That was the whole exchange... I was saying they didn't used to have to publicly breastfeed everywhere and I doubt letting them will make them have more kids.